DDI description: Open Access and Research Data: Researcher Survey 2015 DDI-kuvailu: Avoin tiede ja tutkimusaineistot: tutkijakysely 2015 3123 Finnish Social Science Data Archive Finnish Social Science Data Archive Finnish Social Science Data Archive 1.0.0 Open Access and Research Data: Researcher Survey 2015 [metadata]. Metadata version 1.0.0 (2016-08-12). Finnish Social Science Data Archive [producer and distributor]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.60686/t-fsd3123; URN: https://urn.fi/urn:nbn:fi:fsd:T-FSD3123 FSD:n aineistokuvailut (FSD metadata records), joiden tekijä on Suomen yhteiskuntatieteellinen tietoarkisto (Finnish Social Science Data Archive), on lisensoitu Creative Commons 1.0 Yleismaailmallinen (CC0 1.0) -lisenssillä. FSD:n aineistokuvailut (FSD metadata records) by Suomen yhteiskuntatieteellinen tietoarkisto (Finnish Social Science Data Archive) are licensed under a Creative Commons 1.0 Universal (CC0 1.0) license. FSD:n aineistokuvailut (FSD metadata records) av Finlands samhällsvetenskapliga dataarkiv (Finnish Social Science Data Archive) är licensierade under en Creative Commons 1.0 Universiell (CC0 1.0) licens. Open Access and Research Data: Researcher Survey 2015 Avoin tiede ja tutkimusaineistot: tutkijakysely 2015 3123 urn:nbn:fi:fsd:T-FSD3123 10.60686/t-fsd3123 Fält, Katja 0000-0002-6172-5377 033003e23 Okuloff, Annaleena 033003e23 In accordance with the agreement between FSD and the depositor. Finnish Social Science Data Archive Individual datasets

Individual datasets that do not belong to any series.

 1.0 1.0 Fält, Katja (University of Tampere) & Okuloff, Annaleena (University of Tampere): Open Access and Research Data: Researcher Survey 2015 [dataset]. Data version 1.0 (2016-08-12). Finnish Social Science Data Archive [distributor]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.60686/t-fsd3123; URN: https://urn.fi/urn:nbn:fi:fsd:T-FSD3123 access to information data ethics ethics of science information transfer research centres research workers research right to confidentiality right to privacy Social sciences Information society Information technology

The researcher survey charted the current practices for preservation, sharing, and reuse of digital data in the field of humanities and health sciences. The survey also charted the respondents' views on open access and the reuse of digital research data, as well as their opinions on how to most effectively spread information about open access and research data management. The survey was a part of the FSD's "National Service Provider for CESSDA: Establish, Expand, Equip" project, in which services are tailored specifically for humanities and health sciences. The project was funded by the Academy of Finland.

The questionnaire began with general questions charting the respondents' knowledge about open access and the services provided by the FSD. Next the respondents' views were probed on how digital research data is used at their department/school/unit after research has been completed. The respondents were then asked about barriers relating to archiving and reuse of digital research data as well as the restrictions presented by removal of personal identifiers from data in their field of study. Furthermore, the respondents were asked which factors contribute to the fact that data from completed research projects is not reused in their field of study.

In the next part, the respondents were asked about their opinions on how to restrict the use of datasets if doing so was necessary. Next the respondents were thoroughly interviewed about their views on the advantages and disadvantages of increasing the reuse of digital data. Finally, the respondents were asked which channels and methods would be good for sharing information about research data management and open access.

The background variables included the respondents' organisation, gender, and field of study.

 Finland Finland Individual Individual Researchers of humanities in Finnish universities and research centres, whose field of study were history, archaeology, or ethnology and researchers of health sciences from Finnish universities or research centres whose field of study was other than biosciences Quantitative Cross-section CrossSection Xestia Oy Non-probability: Purposive Nonprobability.Purposive

All researchers of targeted fields of studies in humanities were chosen. In the field of health sciences, the research units were purposely chosen, so that a representative sample of researchers from different fields could be gathered from every university and research centre. The questionnaire was sent by e-mail to every researcher whose e-mail address could be found on the university or research centre web page.

 Self-administered questionnaire: Web-based (CAWI) SelfAdministeredQuestionnaire.CAWI Structured questionnaire Questionnaire.Structured There are no weight variables in the data. 13.9 Detailed and specific data description in Finnish and English. The data are checked and processed in detail. If necessary, the data are anonymised. Finnish Social Science Data Archive The dataset is (B) available for research, teaching and study. The data and its creators shall be cited in all publications and presentations for which the data have been used. The bibliographic citation may be in the form suggested by the archive or in the form required by the publication. Notify FSD of all publications where you have used the data by sending the citation information to user-services.fsd@tuni.fi. The original data creators and the archive bear no responsibility for any results or interpretations arising from the reuse of the data. FSD2268 Open Access to and Reuse of Research Data 2006 Fält, Katja & Okuloff, Annaleena (2016). Avoin tiede ja tutkimusaineistot -kysely 2015. Raportti terveystieteiden ja humanististen alojen tutkijoille suunnatun kyselyn tuloksista. [verkkodokumentti]. Tampere: Yhteiskuntatieteellinen tietoarkisto. Yhteiskuntatieteellisen tietoarkiston julkaisuja; 12. http://www.fsd.uta.fi/fi/julkaisut/julkaisusarja/FSDjs12_tutkimusaineistot-kysely.pdf [viitattu 17.8.2016] Avoin tiede ja tutkimusaineistot -kysely 2015. Raportti terveystieteiden ja humanististen alojen tutkijoille suunnatun kyselyn tuloksista daF3123e.por 199 119 SPSS Portable [fsd_no] FSD study number FSD study number 199 3123 3123 3123.00 .000 [fsd_vr] FSD edition number FSD edition number 199 1.0 1.0 1.000 .0000 [fsd_id] FSD case id FSD case id 199 1 199 100.00 57.591 [time] Date of response Date of response 199 18-MAY-2015 16:12 04-JUN-2015 09:02 23-MAY-2015 09:08 4 15:28:35.638 [q1] The respondent's organization The respondent's organization 197 2 16 7.52 4.466 1 Aalto University 0 2 University of Helsinki 45 3 University of Eastern Finland 17 4 University of Jyväskylä 21 5 University of Lapland 0 6 Lappeenranta University of Technology 0 7 University of Oulu 11 8 Hanken School of Economics 0 9 University of the Arts 0 10 University of Tampere 45 11 University of Turku 29 12 University of Vaasa 0 13 National Institute for Health and Welfare 9 14 Finnish Institute of Occupational Health 11 15 UKK Institute 5 16 Åbo Akademi University 4 SYSMISS 2 [q2] Gender Gender 198 1 2 1.61 .489 1 Male 77 2 Female 121 3 Other 0 SYSMISS 1 [q3] Primary field of study Primary field of study 196 1 16 7.53 3.554 1 Pharmacy 5 2 Dentistry 0 3 Public health science 18 4 Sports science 3 5 Medicine 51 6 Health science 36 7 Statistics 3 8 Occupational health science and environmental science 7 9 History of science and ideas 1 10 Archeologist 5 11 History 42 12 Church history 6 13 Ethnology 8 14 Cultural history 7 15 Finnish/Nordic history 3 16 Economic and social history 1 SYSMISS 3 [q4_1] Does your organisation (at the university/institute-level) have rules or guidelines that govern the preservation of digital research data? Does your organisation (at the university/institute-level) have rules or guidelines that govern the preservation of digital research data? 197 1 4 3.01 1.154 1 Binding rules 30 2 Recommendation 40 3 No 26 4 I don't know 101 SYSMISS 2 [q4_2] Does your organisation (at the university/institute-level) have rules or guidelines that govern sharing digital research data with users other than the original researcher/research group? Does your organisation (at the university/institute-level) have rules or guidelines that govern sharing digital research data with users other than the original researcher/research group? 193 1 4 3.18 1.066 1 Binding rules 20 2 Recommendation 35 3 No 29 4 I don't know 109 SYSMISS 6 [q5_1] Had you, before this questionnaire, heard about guidelines, recommendations or requirements to provide open access to digital research data for the scientific community for scientific use? EU guidelines? Had you, before this questionnaire, heard about guidelines, recommendations or requirements to provide open access to digital research data for the scientific community for scientific use? EU guidelines? 198 1 2 1.73 .444 1 Yes 53 2 No 145 SYSMISS 1 [q5_2] Had you, before this questionnaire, heard about guidelines, recommendations or requirements to provide open access to digital research data for the scientific community for scientific use? Guidelines of the Ministry of Education and Culture? Had you, before this questionnaire, heard about guidelines, recommendations or requirements to provide open access to digital research data for the scientific community for scientific use? Guidelines of the Ministry of Education and Culture? 199 1 2 1.78 .413 1 Yes 43 2 No 156 [q5_3] Had you, before this questionnaire, heard about guidelines, recommendations or requirements to provide open access to digital research data for scientific community for scientific use? Recommendations of funders (e.g. Academy of Finland or TEKES)? Had you, before this questionnaire, heard about guidelines, recommendations or requirements to provide open access to digital research data for scientific community for scientific use? Recommendations of funders (e.g. Academy of Finland or TEKES)? 198 1 2 1.48 .501 1 Yes 103 2 No 95 SYSMISS 1 [q5_4] Had you, before this questionnaire, heard about guidelines, recommendations or requirements to provide open access to digital research data for the scientific community for scientific use? Recommendations and requirements of publishers? Had you, before this questionnaire, heard about guidelines, recommendations or requirements to provide open access to digital research data for the scientific community for scientific use? Recommendations and requirements of publishers? 196 1 2 1.56 .498 1 Yes 86 2 No 110 SYSMISS 3 [q5_5] Had you, before this questionnaire, heard about guidelines, recommendations or requirements to provide open access to digital research data for the scientific community for scientific use? Recommendations of universities? Had you, before this questionnaire, heard about guidelines, recommendations or requirements to provide open access to digital research data for the scientific community for scientific use? Recommendations of universities? 194 1 2 1.67 .471 1 Yes 64 2 No 130 SYSMISS 5 [q6] Did you know about the services provided by the Finnish Social Science Data Archive (FSD) before this survey? Did you know about the services provided by the Finnish Social Science Data Archive (FSD) before this survey? 199 1 3 2.15 .794 1 Yes 50 2 No, but I was aware of the FSD's existence 70 3 No, this is the first time I hear about the FSD 79 [q7_1] Have you used the services of the FSD or do you think you might use them in the future? You can select more than one alternative: I have searched for information on the FSD website Have you used the services of the FSD or do you think you might use them in the future? You can select more than one alternative: I have searched for information on the FSD website 199 0 1 .20 .402 0 Not mentioned 159 1 Mentioned 40 [q7_2] Have you used the services of the FSD or do you think you might use them in the future? You can select more than one alternative: I have used data archived at the FSD Have you used the services of the FSD or do you think you might use them in the future? You can select more than one alternative: I have used data archived at the FSD 199 0 1 .04 .185 0 Not mentioned 192 1 Mentioned 7 [q7_3] Have you used the services of the FSD or do you think you might use them in the future? You can select more than one alternative: I have deposited data at the FSD Have you used the services of the FSD or do you think you might use them in the future? You can select more than one alternative: I have deposited data at the FSD 199 0 1 .02 .141 0 Not mentioned 195 1 Mentioned 4 [q7_4] Have you used the services of the FSD or do you think you might use them in the future? You can select more than one alternative: I have not used the services, but it is likely I will use them in the future Have you used the services of the FSD or do you think you might use them in the future? You can select more than one alternative: I have not used the services, but it is likely I will use them in the future 199 0 1 .63 .483 0 Not mentioned 73 1 Mentioned 126 [q7_5] Have you used the services of the FSD or do you think you might use them in the future? You can select more than one alternative: I have not used the services and it is unlikely I will use them in the future Have you used the services of the FSD or do you think you might use them in the future? You can select more than one alternative: I have not used the services and it is unlikely I will use them in the future 199 0 1 .16 .368 0 Not mentioned 167 1 Mentioned 32 [q8_1] After research is complete: digital research data remain in the care of researchers who originally created them After research is complete: digital research data remain in the care of researchers who originally created them 197 1 5 1.82 1.058 1 Very common 93 2 Fairly common 76 3 Not very common 8 4 Not at all common 11 5 Can't say 9 SYSMISS 2 [q8_2] After research is complete: digital research data are destroyed After research is complete: digital research data are destroyed 194 1 5 3.49 1.064 1 Very common 10 2 Fairly common 23 3 Not very common 54 4 Not at all common 75 5 Can't say 32 SYSMISS 5 [q8_3] After research is complete: digital research data are deposited/archived in your department/school/unit After research is complete: digital research data are deposited/archived in your department/school/unit 190 1 5 2.66 1.291 1 Very common 38 2 Fairly common 64 3 Not very common 36 4 Not at all common 29 5 Can't say 23 SYSMISS 9 [q8_4] After research is complete: digital research data are deposited/archived in your university/institute in a centralised manner After research is complete: digital research data are deposited/archived in your university/institute in a centralised manner 196 1 5 3.57 1.249 1 Very common 15 2 Fairly common 29 3 Not very common 36 4 Not at all common 62 5 Can't say 54 SYSMISS 3 [q8_5] After research is complete: digital research data are deposited in a separate organisation that specialises in research data archiving. After research is complete: digital research data are deposited in a separate organisation that specialises in research data archiving. 191 1 5 3.93 1.059 1 Very common 8 2 Fairly common 13 3 Not very common 27 4 Not at all common 80 5 Can't say 63 SYSMISS 8 [q8_6] No new digital research data are collected for the research we do. (E.g. theoretical research or reuse of data and satistics collected by others) No new digital research data are collected for the research we do. (E.g. theoretical research or reuse of data and satistics collected by others) 170 1 5 3.89 .907 1 Very common 2 2 Fairly common 15 3 Not very common 23 4 Not at all common 90 5 Can't say 40 SYSMISS 29 [q9_1] After research is complete: researchers who colleceted the data use them in further research. After research is complete: researchers who colleceted the data use them in further research. 198 1 5 1.75 1.073 1 To a great extent 101 2 To a fair extent 74 3 To little extent 8 4 Not at all 1 5 Can't say 14 SYSMISS 1 [q9_2] After research is complete: if requested, the data are shared with researchers who study the same topic After research is complete: if requested, the data are shared with researchers who study the same topic 197 1 5 2.61 1.214 1 To a great extent 25 2 To a fair extent 94 3 To little extent 40 4 Not at all 9 5 Can't say 29 SYSMISS 2 [q9_3] After research is complete: the data are available for students of the department /school/unit to be used in seminar papers and theses. After research is complete: the data are available for students of the department /school/unit to be used in seminar papers and theses. 196 1 5 2.94 1.307 1 To a great extent 21 2 To a fair extent 73 3 To little extent 36 4 Not at all 29 5 Can't say 37 SYSMISS 3 [q9_4] After research is complete: the data remain practically unused. After research is complete: the data remain practically unused. 193 1 5 3.12 1.087 1 To a great extent 8 2 To a fair extent 54 3 To little extent 62 4 Not at all 44 5 Can't say 25 SYSMISS 6 [q10] Is it normal practice in your field to create a data management plan when a research plan is being developed? Is it normal practice in your field to create a data management plan when a research plan is being developed? 183 1 4 2.48 .948 1 Normal practice 34 2 Not a normal practice 53 3 Practice varies depending on what purpose the research plain is being developed for 71 4 Can't say 25 SYSMISS 16 [q11_1] Data cannot be archived for reuse because the intellectual property rights of data belong to someone else than the researchers Data cannot be archived for reuse because the intellectual property rights of data belong to someone else than the researchers 185 1 5 3.36 1.252 1 Very well 21 2 Fairly well 22 3 To some extent 50 4 Not very well 54 5 Not at all well 38 SYSMISS 14 [q11_2] Data cannot be archived for reuse because the person/organisation who delivered the data requires that the data be destroyed after research is complete. Data cannot be archived for reuse because the person/organisation who delivered the data requires that the data be destroyed after research is complete. 186 1 5 3.55 1.208 1 Very well 15 2 Fairly well 20 3 To some extent 46 4 Not very well 58 5 Not at all well 47 SYSMISS 13 [q11_3] Data cannot be archived for reuse because the data are personal property of the researcher/research group. Data cannot be archived for reuse because the data are personal property of the researcher/research group. 186 1 5 3.37 1.206 1 Very well 11 2 Fairly well 39 3 To some extent 48 4 Not very well 47 5 Not at all well 41 SYSMISS 13 [q11_4] Data cannot be archived for reuse because outsiders might not be able to interpret the data correctly. Data cannot be archived for reuse because outsiders might not be able to interpret the data correctly. 189 1 5 3.18 1.162 1 Very well 17 2 Fairly well 34 3 To some extent 64 4 Not very well 46 5 Not at all well 28 SYSMISS 10 [q11_5] Data cannot be archived for reuse because the data contain several distinct, separate parts that are difficult to combine. Data cannot be archived for reuse because the data contain several distinct, separate parts that are difficult to combine. 189 1 5 3.14 1.117 1 Very well 14 2 Fairly well 40 3 To some extent 65 4 Not very well 46 5 Not at all well 24 SYSMISS 10 [q11_6] Data cannot be archived for reuse because during data collection, no agreements on the archiving of data are made with the research participants. Data cannot be archived for reuse because during data collection, no agreements on the archiving of data are made with the research participants. 184 1 5 3.05 1.303 1 Very well 27 2 Fairly well 39 3 To some extent 47 4 Not very well 40 5 Not at all well 31 SYSMISS 15 [q12_1] Removing personal identifiers from data does not substantially restrict the opportunities to conduct analyses on them. Removing personal identifiers from data does not substantially restrict the opportunities to conduct analyses on them. 193 1 5 2.37 1.261 1 Very well 60 2 Fairly well 58 3 To some extent 31 4 Not very well 31 5 Not at all well 13 SYSMISS 6 [q12_2] Removing personal identifiers from data substantially restricts the opportunities to use data in a new research setting. Removing personal identifiers from data substantially restricts the opportunities to use data in a new research setting. 190 1 5 3.29 1.250 1 Very well 21 2 Fairly well 30 3 To some extent 47 4 Not very well 57 5 Not at all well 35 SYSMISS 9 [q12_3] Reuse of research data with personal identifiers could be accomplished through a secure remote access service. Reuse of research data with personal identifiers could be accomplished through a secure remote access service. 183 1 5 3.04 1.176 1 Very well 16 2 Fairly well 47 3 To some extent 60 4 Not very well 33 5 Not at all well 27 SYSMISS 16 [q13_1] Reuse of data: Data cannot be used to answer present-day research questions. Reuse of data: Data cannot be used to answer present-day research questions. 192 1 5 3.03 1.202 1 Influences greatly 18 2 Influences a fair amout 53 3 Does not influence much 54 4 Influences very little 39 5 Can't say 28 SYSMISS 7 [q13_2] Reuse of data: Privacy issues: identifiers and originally defined purpose of use prevent reuse. Reuse of data: Privacy issues: identifiers and originally defined purpose of use prevent reuse. 195 1 5 2.64 1.352 1 Influences greatly 46 2 Influences a fair amout 61 3 Does not influence much 31 4 Influences very little 31 5 Can't say 26 SYSMISS 4 [q13_3] Reuse of data: Other issues related to legislation, for example, intellectual property rights. Reuse of data: Other issues related to legislation, for example, intellectual property rights. 193 1 5 3.23 1.212 1 Influences greatly 14 2 Influences a fair amout 45 3 Does not influence much 54 4 Influences very little 43 5 Can't say 37 SYSMISS 6 [q13_4] Reuse of data: Ownership and usage rights of data have not been agreed on during data collection. Reuse of data: Ownership and usage rights of data have not been agreed on during data collection. 190 1 5 3.01 1.301 1 Influences greatly 25 2 Influences a fair amout 53 3 Does not influence much 38 4 Influences very little 43 5 Can't say 31 SYSMISS 9 [q13_5] Reuse of data: IT issues: data are corrupted or file formats / software have become outdated. Reuse of data: IT issues: data are corrupted or file formats / software have become outdated. 192 1 5 3.36 1.189 1 Influences greatly 14 2 Influences a fair amout 36 3 Does not influence much 44 4 Influences very little 63 5 Can't say 35 SYSMISS 7 [q13_6] Reuse of data: Issues related to data use: the content of data and files are inadequately documented and organised. Reuse of data: Issues related to data use: the content of data and files are inadequately documented and organised. 194 1 5 2.87 1.138 1 Influences greatly 17 2 Influences a fair amout 67 3 Does not influence much 55 4 Influences very little 34 5 Can't say 21 SYSMISS 5 [q13_7] Reuse of data: Research ethical issues (please specify in the field below). Reuse of data: Research ethical issues (please specify in the field below). 181 1 5 3.79 1.317 1 Influences greatly 15 2 Influences a fair amout 19 3 Does not influence much 32 4 Influences very little 38 5 Can't say 77 SYSMISS 18 [q13_8] Reuse of data: Other, which? (Please specify in the field below). Reuse of data: Other, which? (Please specify in the field below). 79 1 5 4.52 1.153 1 Influences greatly 5 2 Influences a fair amout 3 3 Does not influence much 3 4 Influences very little 3 5 Can't say 65 SYSMISS 120 [q13_8a] Please specify, which research ethical issues or other factors have influence on the reuse of research data or prevent it: (open-ended) Please specify, which research ethical issues or other factors have influence on the reuse of research data or prevent it: (open-ended) [q14] Would you be prepared to deposit your own research data for archiving, to be reused by other researchers? Would you be prepared to deposit your own research data for archiving, to be reused by other researchers? 192 1 3 1.78 .721 1 Yes 76 2 Maybe 83 3 No 33 SYSMISS 7 [q14a] If you answered ‘yes’ or ‘maybe’, what kind of data would you consider depositing? (open-ended) If you answered ‘yes’ or ‘maybe’, what kind of data would you consider depositing? (open-ended) [q15_1] Terms of data reuse: Data archive delivers the data to the person requesting access to it according to the terms set in the deposit agreement. (For example, only for research purposes or also for study and teaching purposes). Terms of data reuse: Data archive delivers the data to the person requesting access to it according to the terms set in the deposit agreement. (For example, only for research purposes or also for study and teaching purposes). 199 0 1 .56 .497 0 Not mentioned 87 1 Mentioned 112 [q15_2] Terms of data reuse: The researcher who originally created the data reviews applications him/herself and decides who can access the data. Terms of data reuse: The researcher who originally created the data reviews applications him/herself and decides who can access the data. 199 0 1 .29 .456 0 Not mentioned 141 1 Mentioned 58 [q15_3] Terms of data reuse: The researcher who originally created the data reviews applications him/herself and decides on a case-by-case basis whether all or only parts of the data will be delivered for reuse. (For example, only certain variables). Terms of data reuse: The researcher who originally created the data reviews applications him/herself and decides on a case-by-case basis whether all or only parts of the data will be delivered for reuse. (For example, only certain variables). 199 0 1 .41 .493 0 Not mentioned 118 1 Mentioned 81 [q15_4] Terms of data reuse: Reuse of data is temporarily prevented (embargo) and afterwards the data archive can deliver the data for the purposes stated in the deposit agreement. Terms of data reuse: Reuse of data is temporarily prevented (embargo) and afterwards the data archive can deliver the data for the purposes stated in the deposit agreement. 199 0 1 .31 .464 0 Not mentioned 137 1 Mentioned 62 [q16_1] Advantages of increasing reuse of digital research data: Reduces duplicate dat a collection. Advantages of increasing reuse of digital research data: Reduces duplicate dat a collection. 190 1 4 1.57 .708 1 Significant advantage 104 2 Fairly significant advantage 66 3 Not a very significant advantage 18 4 Not an advantage at all 2 SYSMISS 9 [q16_2] Advantages of increasing reuse of digital research data: Research funding is used more efficiently, as data can be used in several research projects. Advantages of increasing reuse of digital research data: Research funding is used more efficiently, as data can be used in several research projects. 187 1 3 1.56 .664 1 Significant advantage 100 2 Fairly significant advantage 69 3 Not a very significant advantage 18 4 Not an advantage at all 0 SYSMISS 12 [q16_3] Advantages of increasing reuse of digital research data: Data archiving enables more varied research designs (e.g. longitudinal comparison). Advantages of increasing reuse of digital research data: Data archiving enables more varied research designs (e.g. longitudinal comparison). 190 1 4 1.54 .663 1 Significant advantage 104 2 Fairly significant advantage 70 3 Not a very significant advantage 15 4 Not an advantage at all 1 SYSMISS 9 [q16_4] Advantages of increasing reuse of digital research data: Increases interaction and networking within the scientific community. Advantages of increasing reuse of digital research data: Increases interaction and networking within the scientific community. 190 1 4 1.81 .734 1 Significant advantage 70 2 Fairly significant advantage 90 3 Not a very significant advantage 27 4 Not an advantage at all 3 SYSMISS 9 [q16_5] Advantages of increasing reuse of digital research data: Facilitates verification (and repeatability) of research results. Advantages of increasing reuse of digital research data: Facilitates verification (and repeatability) of research results. 191 1 4 1.75 .723 1 Significant advantage 76 2 Fairly significant advantage 89 3 Not a very significant advantage 23 4 Not an advantage at all 3 SYSMISS 8 [q16_6] Advantages of increasing reuse of digital research data: Facilitates development of research methods. Advantages of increasing reuse of digital research data: Facilitates development of research methods. 185 1 4 2.07 .794 1 Significant advantage 45 2 Fairly significant advantage 89 3 Not a very significant advantage 44 4 Not an advantage at all 7 SYSMISS 14 [q16_7] Advantages of increasing reuse of digital research data: Improves the quality of teaching. Advantages of increasing reuse of digital research data: Improves the quality of teaching. 181 1 4 2.39 .771 1 Significant advantage 23 2 Fairly significant advantage 74 3 Not a very significant advantage 75 4 Not an advantage at all 9 SYSMISS 18 [q16_8] Advantages of increasing reuse of digital research data: Researchers who have created the data obtain academic credentials for data sharing, for example, through citations to data or merits added to a curriculum vitae. Advantages of increasing reuse of digital research data: Researchers who have created the data obtain academic credentials for data sharing, for example, through citations to data or merits added to a curriculum vitae. 188 1 4 2.38 .815 1 Significant advantage 27 2 Fairly significant advantage 76 3 Not a very significant advantage 72 4 Not an advantage at all 13 SYSMISS 11 [q16_9] Advantages of increasing reuse of digital research data: Makes data more equally available for different research groups. Advantages of increasing reuse of digital research data: Makes data more equally available for different research groups. 183 1 4 1.95 .739 1 Significant advantage 52 2 Fairly significant advantage 92 3 Not a very significant advantage 36 4 Not an advantage at all 3 SYSMISS 16 [q16_10] Advantages of increasing reuse of digital research data: Increases the social impact of research. Advantages of increasing reuse of digital research data: Increases the social impact of research. 185 1 4 1.94 .805 1 Significant advantage 59 2 Fairly significant advantage 86 3 Not a very significant advantage 33 4 Not an advantage at all 7 SYSMISS 14 [q16_11] Advantages of increasing reuse of digital research data: Archiving research data for reuse promotes long- term preservation and use of cultural heritage. Advantages of increasing reuse of digital research data: Archiving research data for reuse promotes long- term preservation and use of cultural heritage. 185 1 4 1.87 .817 1 Significant advantage 70 2 Fairly significant advantage 74 3 Not a very significant advantage 36 4 Not an advantage at all 5 SYSMISS 14 [q16_12] Advantages of increasing reuse of digital research data: other advantage, which Advantages of increasing reuse of digital research data: other advantage, which 16 1 4 2.31 1.401 1 Significant advantage 7 2 Fairly significant advantage 3 3 Not a very significant advantage 0 4 Not an advantage at all 6 SYSMISS 183 [q16_12a] Advantages of increasing reuse of digital research data: other advantage, which(open-ended) Advantages of increasing reuse of digital research data: other advantage, which(open-ended) [q16_13] Advantages of increasing reuse of digital research data: other advantage, which Advantages of increasing reuse of digital research data: other advantage, which 8 1 4 3.50 1.069 1 Significant advantage 1 2 Fairly significant advantage 0 3 Not a very significant advantage 1 4 Not an advantage at all 6 SYSMISS 191 [q16_13a] Advantages of increasing reuse of digital research data: other advantage, which(open-ended) Advantages of increasing reuse of digital research data: other advantage, which(open-ended) [q16_14] Advantages of increasing reuse of digital research data: other advantage, which Advantages of increasing reuse of digital research data: other advantage, which 6 4 4 4.00 .000 1 Significant advantage 0 2 Fairly significant advantage 0 3 Not a very significant advantage 0 4 Not an advantage at all 6 SYSMISS 193 [q16_14a] Advantages of increasing reuse of digital research data: other advantage, which(open-ended) Advantages of increasing reuse of digital research data: other advantage, which(open-ended) [q17_1] Disadvantages of increasing reuse of digital research data: Incompetence in data reuse and the resulting errors. Disadvantages of increasing reuse of digital research data: Incompetence in data reuse and the resulting errors. 188 1 4 2.07 .801 1 Significant disadvantage 51 2 Fairly significant disadvantage 76 3 Not a very significant disadvantage 58 4 Not a disadvantage at all 3 SYSMISS 11 [q17_2] Disadvantages of increasing reuse of digital research data: Researchers have to spend time on making data suitable for reuse (conversion, sorting, documentation). Disadvantages of increasing reuse of digital research data: Researchers have to spend time on making data suitable for reuse (conversion, sorting, documentation). 187 1 4 2.17 .796 1 Significant disadvantage 43 2 Fairly significant disadvantage 73 3 Not a very significant disadvantage 68 4 Not a disadvantage at all 3 SYSMISS 12 [q17_3] Disadvantages of increasing reuse of digital research data: Researchers have to spend time on advising reusers of data. Disadvantages of increasing reuse of digital research data: Researchers have to spend time on advising reusers of data. 184 1 4 2.37 .712 1 Significant disadvantage 21 2 Fairly significant disadvantage 78 3 Not a very significant disadvantage 81 4 Not a disadvantage at all 4 SYSMISS 15 [q17_4] Disadvantages of increasing reuse of digital research data: Data reuse increases disclosure risks and research ethical risks Disadvantages of increasing reuse of digital research data: Data reuse increases disclosure risks and research ethical risks 189 1 4 2.10 .816 1 Significant disadvantage 50 2 Fairly significant disadvantage 74 3 Not a very significant disadvantage 61 4 Not a disadvantage at all 4 SYSMISS 10 [q17_5] Disadvantages of increasing reuse of digital research data: Loss of ‘competitive advantage’ when researchers share data they have collected themselves with the scientific community Disadvantages of increasing reuse of digital research data: Loss of ‘competitive advantage’ when researchers share data they have collected themselves with the scientific community 188 1 4 2.35 .855 1 Significant disadvantage 34 2 Fairly significant disadvantage 67 3 Not a very significant disadvantage 74 4 Not a disadvantage at all 13 SYSMISS 11 [q17_6] Disadvantages of increasing reuse of digital research data: Research participants have not been told that the information collected from them will be archived for reuse by the scientific community. Disadvantages of increasing reuse of digital research data: Research participants have not been told that the information collected from them will be archived for reuse by the scientific community. 187 1 4 1.86 .951 1 Significant disadvantage 87 2 Fairly significant disadvantage 51 3 Not a very significant disadvantage 37 4 Not a disadvantage at all 12 SYSMISS 12 [q17_7] Disadvantages of increasing reuse of digital research data: other disadvantage, which Disadvantages of increasing reuse of digital research data: other disadvantage, which 13 1 4 2.77 1.423 1 Significant disadvantage 4 2 Fairly significant disadvantage 2 3 Not a very significant disadvantage 0 4 Not a disadvantage at all 7 SYSMISS 186 [q17_7a] Disadvantages of increasing reuse of digital research data: other disadvantage, which(open-ended) Disadvantages of increasing reuse of digital research data: other disadvantage, which(open-ended) [q17_8] Disadvantages of increasing reuse of digital research data: other disadvantage, which Disadvantages of increasing reuse of digital research data: other disadvantage, which 6 4 4 4.00 .000 1 Significant disadvantage 0 2 Fairly significant disadvantage 0 3 Not a very significant disadvantage 0 4 Not a disadvantage at all 6 SYSMISS 193 [q17_8a] Disadvantages of increasing reuse of digital research data: other disadvantage, which(open-ended) Disadvantages of increasing reuse of digital research data: other disadvantage, which(open-ended) [q17_9] Disadvantages of increasing reuse of digital research data: other disadvantage, which Disadvantages of increasing reuse of digital research data: other disadvantage, which 6 4 4 4.00 .000 1 Significant disadvantage 0 2 Fairly significant disadvantage 0 3 Not a very significant disadvantage 0 4 Not a disadvantage at all 6 SYSMISS 193 [q17_9a] Disadvantages of increasing reuse of digital research data: other disadvantage, which(open-ended) Disadvantages of increasing reuse of digital research data: other disadvantage, which(open-ended) [q18_1] Benefits of reusing data: Better visibility for own research. Benefits of reusing data: Better visibility for own research. 199 0 1 .72 .448 0 Not mentioned 55 1 Mentioned 144 [q18_2] Benefits of reusing data: Improved opportunities to receive funding for own research. Benefits of reusing data: Improved opportunities to receive funding for own research. 199 0 1 .57 .496 0 Not mentioned 85 1 Mentioned 114 [q18_3] Benefits of reusing data: Added merit to curriculum vitae. Benefits of reusing data: Added merit to curriculum vitae. 199 0 1 .48 .501 0 Not mentioned 104 1 Mentioned 95 [q18_4] Benefits of reusing data: A merit comparable to a publication in a researcher’s list of publications Benefits of reusing data: A merit comparable to a publication in a researcher’s list of publications 199 0 1 .43 .497 0 Not mentioned 113 1 Mentioned 86 [q18_5] Benefits of reusing data: Data reuse numbers as part of a researcher’s list of publications - the larger the number of citations/reusers the greater the merit. Benefits of reusing data: Data reuse numbers as part of a researcher’s list of publications - the larger the number of citations/reusers the greater the merit. 199 0 1 .46 .500 0 Not mentioned 107 1 Mentioned 92 [q18_6] Benefits of reusing data: In some other way, how?(open-ended) Benefits of reusing data: In some other way, how?(open-ended) 199 0 1 .01 .071 0 Not mentioned 198 1 Mentioned 1 [q18_6a] Benefits of reusing data: In some other way Benefits of reusing data: In some other way [q19_1] What would be a good channel for sharing information about research data management and open access? You can select more than one alternative: National resource centres/organisations (CSC, FSD, biobanks etc.) What would be a good channel for sharing information about research data management and open access? You can select more than one alternative: National resource centres/organisations (CSC, FSD, biobanks etc.) 199 0 1 .63 .485 0 Not mentioned 74 1 Mentioned 125 [q19_2] What would be a good channel for sharing information about research data management and open access? You can select more than one alternative: Own research organisation in a centralised manner (e.g. research administration at organisation level) What would be a good channel for sharing information about research data management and open access? You can select more than one alternative: Own research organisation in a centralised manner (e.g. research administration at organisation level) 199 0 1 .42 .494 0 Not mentioned 116 1 Mentioned 83 [q19_3] What would be a good channel for sharing information about research data management and open access? You can select more than one alternative: Own research organisation in a decentralised manner (e.g. research unit level) What would be a good channel for sharing information about research data management and open access? You can select more than one alternative: Own research organisation in a decentralised manner (e.g. research unit level) 199 0 1 .27 .446 0 Not mentioned 145 1 Mentioned 54 [q19_4] What would be a good channel for sharing information about research data management and open access? You can select more than one alternative: University libraries and research institute libraries What would be a good channel for sharing information about research data management and open access? You can select more than one alternative: University libraries and research institute libraries 199 0 1 .55 .498 0 Not mentioned 89 1 Mentioned 110 [q19_5] What would be a good channel for sharing information about research data management and open access? You can select more than one alternative: Undergraduate education in universities What would be a good channel for sharing information about research data management and open access? You can select more than one alternative: Undergraduate education in universities 199 0 1 .17 .377 0 Not mentioned 165 1 Mentioned 34 [q19_6] What would be a good channel for sharing information about research data management and open access? You can select more than one alternative: Postgraduate education in universities What would be a good channel for sharing information about research data management and open access? You can select more than one alternative: Postgraduate education in universities 199 0 1 .62 .487 0 Not mentioned 76 1 Mentioned 123 [q19_7] What would be a good channel for sharing information about research data management and open access? You can select more than one alternative: Staff training in universities/research institutes What would be a good channel for sharing information about research data management and open access? You can select more than one alternative: Staff training in universities/research institutes 199 0 1 .23 .419 0 Not mentioned 154 1 Mentioned 45 [q19_8] What would be a good channel for sharing information about research data management and open access? You can select more than one alternative: Own research unit What would be a good channel for sharing information about research data management and open access? You can select more than one alternative: Own research unit 199 0 1 .25 .432 0 Not mentioned 150 1 Mentioned 49 [q19_9] What would be a good channel for sharing information about research data management and open access? You can select more than one alternative: Funders (e.g. Academy of Finland, Finnish Work Environment Fund, TEKES) What would be a good channel for sharing information about research data management and open access? You can select more than one alternative: Funders (e.g. Academy of Finland, Finnish Work Environment Fund, TEKES) 199 0 1 .45 .499 0 Not mentioned 109 1 Mentioned 90 [q19_10] What would be a good channel for sharing information about research data management and open access? You can select more than one alternative: Research ethics boards What would be a good channel for sharing information about research data management and open access? You can select more than one alternative: Research ethics boards 199 0 1 .26 .440 0 Not mentioned 147 1 Mentioned 52 [q19_11] What would be a good channel for sharing information about research data management and open access? You can select more than one alternative: Learned societies / Academic associations What would be a good channel for sharing information about research data management and open access? You can select more than one alternative: Learned societies / Academic associations 199 0 1 .29 .456 0 Not mentioned 141 1 Mentioned 58 [q19_12] What would be a good channel for sharing information about research data management and open access? You can select more than one alternative: Professional associations of researchers What would be a good channel for sharing information about research data management and open access? You can select more than one alternative: Professional associations of researchers 199 0 1 .09 .280 0 Not mentioned 182 1 Mentioned 17 [q19_13] What would be a good channel for sharing information about research data management and open access? You can select more than one alternative: Scientific journals and publishers What would be a good channel for sharing information about research data management and open access? You can select more than one alternative: Scientific journals and publishers 199 0 1 .18 .382 0 Not mentioned 164 1 Mentioned 35 [q19_14] What would be a good channel for sharing information about research data management and open access? You can select more than one alternative: Guidebooks and textbooks What would be a good channel for sharing information about research data management and open access? You can select more than one alternative: Guidebooks and textbooks 199 0 1 .11 .314 0 Not mentioned 177 1 Mentioned 22 [q19_15] What would be a good channel for sharing information about research data management and open access? You can select more than one alternative: Research seminars, meetings and conferences What would be a good channel for sharing information about research data management and open access? You can select more than one alternative: Research seminars, meetings and conferences 199 0 1 .42 .494 0 Not mentioned 116 1 Mentioned 83 [q20_1] Which of the following do you think are functional for receiving information on research data management and open access? You can select more than one alternative: Information package on a website Which of the following do you think are functional for receiving information on research data management and open access? You can select more than one alternative: Information package on a website 199 0 1 .82 .382 0 Not mentioned 35 1 Mentioned 164 [q20_2] Which of the following do you think are functional for receiving information on research data management and open access? You can select more than one alternative: Short training session or seminar Which of the following do you think are functional for receiving information on research data management and open access? You can select more than one alternative: Short training session or seminar 199 0 1 .51 .501 0 Not mentioned 97 1 Mentioned 102 [q20_3] Which of the following do you think are functional for receiving information on research data management and open access? You can select more than one alternative: 1- 2 -day training Which of the following do you think are functional for receiving information on research data management and open access? You can select more than one alternative: 1- 2 -day training 199 0 1 .10 .295 0 Not mentioned 180 1 Mentioned 19 [q20_4] Which of the following do you think are functional for receiving information on research data management and open access? You can select more than one alternative: Printed guide or textbook Which of the following do you think are functional for receiving information on research data management and open access? You can select more than one alternative: Printed guide or textbook 199 0 1 .21 .409 0 Not mentioned 157 1 Mentioned 42 [q20_5] Which of the following do you think are functional for receiving information on research data management and open access? You can select more than one alternative: Tailored article in a journal of own field of study Which of the following do you think are functional for receiving information on research data management and open access? You can select more than one alternative: Tailored article in a journal of own field of study 199 0 1 .30 .460 0 Not mentioned 139 1 Mentioned 60 [q20_6] Which of the following do you think are functional for receiving information on research data management and open access? You can select more than one alternative: Information sent through an email list Which of the following do you think are functional for receiving information on research data management and open access? You can select more than one alternative: Information sent through an email list 199 0 1 .45 .499 0 Not mentioned 109 1 Mentioned 90 [q20_7] Which of the following do you think are functional for receiving information on research data management and open access? You can select more than one alternative: Other, which Which of the following do you think are functional for receiving information on research data management and open access? You can select more than one alternative: Other, which 199 0 1 .04 .185 0 Not mentioned 192 1 Mentioned 7 [q20_7a] Which of the following do you think are functional for receiving information on research data management and open access? You can select more than one alternative: Other, which(open-ended) Which of the following do you think are functional for receiving information on research data management and open access? You can select more than one alternative: Other, which(open-ended) [q21_1] Thinking about your own field of study, how suitable do you think the following actors would be for carrying out the archiving and delivery of digital research data for reuse? International data archive (e.g. PubMed) Thinking about your own field of study, how suitable do you think the following actors would be for carrying out the archiving and delivery of digital research data for reuse? International data archive (e.g. PubMed) 170 1 5 2.89 1.236 1 Very suitable 23 2 Fairly suitable 52 3 Neither suitable or unsuitable 33 4 Fairly unsuitable 44 5 Very unsuitable 18 SYSMISS 29 [q21_2] Thinking about your own field of study, how suitable do you think the following actors would be for carrying out the archiving and delivery of digital research data for reuse? National data archive Thinking about your own field of study, how suitable do you think the following actors would be for carrying out the archiving and delivery of digital research data for reuse? National data archive 178 1 5 1.97 .977 1 Very suitable 61 2 Fairly suitable 82 3 Neither suitable or unsuitable 19 4 Fairly unsuitable 11 5 Very unsuitable 5 SYSMISS 21 [q21_3] Thinking about your own field of study, how suitable do you think the following actors would be for carrying out the archiving and delivery of digital research data for reuse? University or research institute locally Thinking about your own field of study, how suitable do you think the following actors would be for carrying out the archiving and delivery of digital research data for reuse? University or research institute locally 182 1 5 2.35 .962 1 Very suitable 29 2 Fairly suitable 90 3 Neither suitable or unsuitable 37 4 Fairly unsuitable 22 5 Very unsuitable 4 SYSMISS 17 [q21_4] Thinking about your own field of study, how suitable do you think the following actors would be for carrying out the archiving and delivery of digital research data for reuse? Original researcher or research group Thinking about your own field of study, how suitable do you think the following actors would be for carrying out the archiving and delivery of digital research data for reuse? Original researcher or research group 174 1 5 3.07 1.183 1 Very suitable 16 2 Fairly suitable 48 3 Neither suitable or unsuitable 36 4 Fairly unsuitable 55 5 Very unsuitable 19 SYSMISS 25 [q22] Finally, we would like to ask for your feedback, experiences and thoughts related to reuse of digital research data. We welcome any opinions you may have!(open-ended) Finally, we would like to ask for your feedback, experiences and thoughts related to reuse of digital research data. We welcome any opinions you may have!(open-ended)