DDI description: Finnish Perceptions of Justice: Judges 2016 DDI-kuvailu: Suomalaisten oikeustaju: tuomarit 2016 3163 Finnish Social Science Data Archive Finnish Social Science Data Archive Finnish Social Science Data Archive 1.0.0 Finnish Perceptions of Justice: Judges 2016 [metadata]. Metadata version 1.0.0 (2017-09-12). Finnish Social Science Data Archive [producer and distributor]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.60686/t-fsd3163; URN: https://urn.fi/urn:nbn:fi:fsd:T-FSD3163 FSD:n aineistokuvailut (FSD metadata records), joiden tekijä on Suomen yhteiskuntatieteellinen tietoarkisto (Finnish Social Science Data Archive), on lisensoitu Creative Commons 1.0 Yleismaailmallinen (CC0 1.0) -lisenssillä. FSD:n aineistokuvailut (FSD metadata records) by Suomen yhteiskuntatieteellinen tietoarkisto (Finnish Social Science Data Archive) are licensed under a Creative Commons 1.0 Universal (CC0 1.0) license. FSD:n aineistokuvailut (FSD metadata records) av Finlands samhällsvetenskapliga dataarkiv (Finnish Social Science Data Archive) är licensierade under en Creative Commons 1.0 Universiell (CC0 1.0) licens. Finnish Perceptions of Justice: Judges 2016 Suomalaisten oikeustaju: tuomarit 2016 3163 urn:nbn:fi:fsd:T-FSD3163 10.60686/t-fsd3163 Kääriäinen, Juha In accordance with the agreement between FSD and the depositor. Finnish Social Science Data Archive Individual datasets

Individual datasets that do not belong to any series.

1.0 Kääriäinen, Juha (University of Helsinki): Finnish Perceptions of Justice: Judges 2016 [dataset]. Data version 1.0 (2017-09-12). Finnish Social Science Data Archive [distributor]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.60686/t-fsd3163; URN: https://urn.fi/urn:nbn:fi:fsd:T-FSD3163 courts court cases crime and security criminal courts criminal law judges judgments (law) law legal decisions offences punishment Social sciences Legislation and legal systems

In the survey, Finnish district court judges were asked to pass a sentence on various crimes according to current legal praxis. The respondents were described seven different cases, and asked what sentence they would pass in each of the cases.

The imaginary cases constructed for the survey describe following crimes: 1. Violence in public space (aggravated assault), 2. Sexual intercourse with a minor (sexual abuse of a child), 3. Sexual intercourse with a sleeping person, and coercion into sex (rape), 4. Violence in domestic relationship (assault), 5. Smuggling and selling narcotics (aggravated narcotics offence), 6. Tax evasion (aggravated tax fraud), 7. Operating a car while under the influence of alcohol (driving while seriously intoxicated).

The background variable is the respondent's gender.

Finland Finland Individual Individual District court judges and lawmen in mainland Finland Bachelors of Law Quantitative Cross-section CrossSection TNS Gallup Finland Total universe/Complete enumeration TotalUniverseCompleteEnumeration

The survey was sent to all district court judges and lawmen in mainland Finland. Bachelors of Law were not included.

Self-administered questionnaire: Web-based (CAWI) SelfAdministeredQuestionnaire.CAWI Structured questionnaire Questionnaire.Structured There are no weight variables in the data. 38.7 Detailed and specific data description in Finnish and English. The data are checked and processed in detail. If necessary, the data are anonymised. Finnish Social Science Data Archive The variable for survey language was removed during archiving. The dataset is (B) available for research, teaching and study. The data and its creators shall be cited in all publications and presentations for which the data have been used. The bibliographic citation may be in the form suggested by the archive or in the form required by the publication. Notify FSD of all publications where you have used the data by sending the citation information to user-services.fsd@tuni.fi. The original data creators and the archive bear no responsibility for any results or interpretations arising from the reuse of the data. FSD3162 Finnish Perceptions of Justice: Citizens 2016 Kääriäinen, Juha (2017) Seitsemän rikostapausta: käräjätuomareiden arvioima rangaistuskäytäntö ja väestön rangaistusvalinnat. Helsinki: Helsingin yliopisto. Kriminologian ja oikeuspolitiikan instituutti. Katsauksia 21/2017. http://hdl.handle.net/10138/190440 Seitsemän rikostapausta: käräjätuomareiden arvioima rangaistuskäytäntö ja väestön rangaistusvalinnat. 10138/190440