FSD3259 Understanding People and Understanding Things 2013

Related Publications Tooltip

Svedholm-Häkkinen, A. M., & Lindeman, M. (2018). Actively Open-Minded Thinking: Development of a shortened scale and disentangling attitudes towards knowledge and people. Thinking & Reasoning, 24, 2140.

Lindeman, M. & Lipsanen, J. (2017). Mentalizing: Seeking the underlying dimensions. International Journal of Psychological Studies, 9, 10-23.

Svedholm-Häkkinen, A. M., Ojala, S. J., & Lindeman, M. (2018). Male brain type women and female brain type men: Gender atypical cognitive profiles and their correlates. Personality and Individual Differences, 122, 7-12.

Svedholm-Häkkinen, A. M., Halme, S., & Lindeman, M. (2018). Empathizing and systemizing are differentially related to dimensions of autistic traits in the general population. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 18, 35-42.

Svedholm-Häkkinen, A. M. & Lindeman, M. (2017): Intuitive and Deliberative Empathizers and Systemizers. Journal of Personality, 85, 593-602.

Lindeman, M., Koirikivi, I. & Lipsanen, J. (2016). Pictorial Empathy Test (PET). An easy-to-use method for assessing affective empathic reactions. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000353

Svedholm-Häkkinen, A. M. & Lindeman, M. (2016). Testing the Empathizing-Systemizing theory in the general population: Occupations, vocational interests, grades, hobbies, friendship quality, social intelligence, and sex role identity. Personality and Individual Differences, 90, 365-370.

Lindeman, M. & Lipsanen, J. (2016). Diverse cognitive profiles of religious believers and nonbelievers. International Journal for The Psychology of Religion, 26, 185-192.

Lindeman, M., Svedholm-Häkkinen, A. M., Lipsanen, J. (2015). Ontological confusions but not mentalizing abilities predict religious belief, paranormal belief, and belief in supernatural purpose. Cognition, 134, 63-76.

Koirikivi, Iiro (2014). Measurement of affective empathy with Pictorial Empathy Test (PET). University of Helsinki. Psychology Master's Thesis.

Halme, Saara (2015). Empatisoinnin ja systemoinnin yhteys autistisiin piirteisiin normaaliväestössä. Helsinki: Helsingin yliopisto. Psykologian pro gradu -tutkielma. URN:NBN:fi:hulib-201505191254

Tanskanen, Katri (2015). Ajattelutyylin yhteys yliluonnollisiin uskomuksiin, sekä sukupuolen ja iän moderoiva vaikutus tuohon yhteyteen. Helsinki: Helsingin yliopisto. Psykologian pro gradu -tutkielma. URN:NBN:fi:hulib-201510153732

Napola, Jukka (2015). Cognitive biases, cognitive miserliness, and belief inflexibility. Comparing paranormal and religious believers and sceptics in terms of analytical and intuitive thinking. Helsinki: University of Helsinki. Psykologian pro gradu -tutkielma. URN:NBN:fi:hulib-201601281102

Lindeman, M., Koirikivi, I., & Lipsanen, J. (2018). Pictorial Empathy Test. An easy-to use method of affective empathic abilities. European Journal of Psychological Assessment., 34, 421-431. doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000353

Lindeman, M. & Svedholm-Häkkinen, A. M. (2016). Does poor understanding of physical world predict religious and paranormal beliefs? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30, 736-742.

Ojala, Sini (2016). Male brain type women and female brain type men: Atypical cognitive styles and their correlates. Helsinki: University of Helsinki. Psychology Master's thesis.URN:NBN:fi:hulib-201701231111

Study description in machine readable DDI-C 2.5 format

Creative Commons License
Metadata record is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.