FSD3285 Social Distinctions in Modern Russia 1990

The dataset is (B) available for research, teaching and study.

Download the data

Study description in other languages

in Finnish

Related files

Study title

Social Distinctions in Modern Russia 1990

Dataset ID Number

FSD3285

Persistent identifier

urn:nbn:fi:fsd:T-FSD3285

Data Type

Quantitative

Authors

Nikula, Jouko (University of Helsinki. Aleksanteri Institute)

Abstract

This study is part of a survey series that charts various issues characterising social differentiation in contemporary Russian society. The surveys in the series have been conducted in 1990, 1998, 2006 and 2015, facilitating research on temporal change. Social differentiation in this study was mainly considered in terms of occupation, social mobility, property and income, but attitudes, politics and religion were also examined. The study aimed to survey the respondents' conditions in life together with their values in order to examine the interaction between the two.

Most questions in the survey concerned the respondents' working life and the atmosphere of their workplace. Questions focused on, for example, whether the respondents worked for the public or private sector, what kind of company they worked for, what kind of independency and responsibilities the respondents had in their work, whether the respondents were in a decision-making position at work, and what kind of relationship they had with their co-workers. Additionally, the respondents were asked whether they thought their education had provided them with the qualifications needed in their work, whether they attended further training at present, and whether they wanted to continue their studies in the near future and for what reason.

The survey also included questions on the respondents' family, childhood, religiosity, friends, and owned property. The socio-economic status of the respondents' parents, spouse/partner and friends was surveyed, and the respondents were asked whether they owned or would like to own various property and items, such as their own house or car, a washing machine, colour television, and computer. Finally, the respondents' views on the socio-economic status of different occupations and their opinions on state and private ownership as well as some social phenomena were surveyed. The respondents were asked, for example, how much they thought people in different occupations (e.g. teachers, engineers, managers, surgeons) earned on average per month and how much they thought people in these occupations should earn. The examined social phenomena included, for example, what the respondents thought were the reasons for the misery and poverty of people.

Background variables included the sector in which the respondent worked in, the respondent's employment history, status in employment, education, age, marital status, number of children, ages of children, gender and whether they owned various household durable goods.

Keywords

educational background; family environment; family life; interpersonal relations; labour and employment; occupational life; political action; political attitudes; socio-economic status; standard of living; workers participation

Topic Classification

Social sciences (Fields of Science Classification)
Economic systems and development (CESSDA Topic Classification)
Working conditions (CESSDA Topic Classification)
Language and linguistics (CESSDA Topic Classification)
Political behaviour and attitudes (CESSDA Topic Classification)
Political ideology (CESSDA Topic Classification)
Information technology (CESSDA Topic Classification)
Equality, inequality and social exclusion (CESSDA Topic Classification)
Family life and marriage (CESSDA Topic Classification)
Occupational health (CESSDA Topic Classification)
Religion and values (CESSDA Topic Classification)
Housing (CESSDA Topic Classification)

Series

Social Distinctions in Modern Russia

Distributor

Finnish Social Science Data Archive

Access

The dataset is (B) available for research, teaching and study.

Data Collector

Chernysh, Mikhail (Russian Academy of Sciences. Institute of Sociology)

Time Period Covered

1990

Collection Dates

1990

Nation

Russia

Geographical Coverage

Russia

Analysis/Observation Unit Type

Individual

Universe

Russian citizens aged over 18 (excluding sparsely populated areas and employees in certain institutions (the armed forces, prisons, highest positions in administration, and hospitals))

Time Method

Longitudinal: Trend/Repeated cross-section

Sampling Procedure

Probability: Stratified: Proportional

Probability: Simple random

The sample size was approximately 3,000 respondents. The sample was formed based on the following principles: the sample must allow for a reasonable equilibrium between the costs of the study, the precision of the data and the design of the sample should be clear enough to allow for easy replication in the future, and the sample must be well documented.

The above principles set some constraints on the sample design: sparsely populated areas or areas difficult to access were not included in the sample. Additionally, certain institutions (the armed forces, prisons, highest positions in administration, and hospitals) were not included. The exclusion of this part of the population from the sample led to a smaller proportion of males in the sample, because the majority of employees (over 80%) in these institutions are male.

The interviews were organised through administrative districts (rayons). The population of rayons ranges from 50,000 to 300,000, and there are close to 2,800 rayons in Russia. Rayons can be divided into three types: (1) big city rayons, (2) town and village rayons, (3) urban rayons. The given sample design was based on the data of the 1989 All-Russia Census conducted by the State Committee of Statistics, and the MicroCensus of 1994. It was possible to select the respondents randomly based on electoral areas, for which very in-depth information of the population is available. Big cities (such as Moscow and St. Petersburg) were analysed separately in the sample. In big cities, the sample was generated by a random choice of household telephone numbers. For more information on the formation on the sample, see the background file.

Collection Mode

Face-to-face interview: Paper-and-pencil (PAPI)

Research Instrument

Structured questionnaire

Data File Language

Downloaded data package may contain different language versions of the same files.

The data files of this dataset are available in the following languages: English.

FSD translates quantitative data into English on request, free of charge. More information on ordering data translation.

Number of Cases and Variables

234 variables and 2133 cases.

Data Version

1.0

Completeness of Data and Restrictions

To prevent identification of respondents, the oldest respondents were combined into one category in variable q78 denoting year of birth. Respondents with a Master's or a doctoral degree were combined into one category with respondents with a higher education degree in variables q63 and q80. The highest numbers of children were combined into one category in variable q99. Changes made at FSD were marked with [square brackets].

Some questions regarding job titles and work tasks were removed because of their vagueness (q6, q8, q35, q57, q65_1, q84, q86, q97, q102, q103, q104, q113, q114, q121, q123, q127, q135, q144, q149, q154, q116). Some variables were marked as missing from the data (q171_3, q171_4, q171_5, q171_6, q171_7, q171_8, q171_9, q171_10, q172_1, q172_2, q172_3, q172_4, q172_5, q172_6, q172_7, q172_8, q172_9, q172_10, q173, q174). A few variables were only included in the questionnaire and not in the data (q7, q85). Similarly, a few variables were only included in the data and not in the questionnaire (q22_1, q22_2, q23). Two variables were missing from both the questionnaire and the data (q16, q119). Some variables were only included in the US version of the questionnaire (q18, q19, q87, q88, q94, q95, q108, q109, q131, q139, q164-q170, q181, q182, q183, q184, q185).

Weighting

There are no weight variables in the data.

Citation Requirement

The data and its creators shall be cited in all publications and presentations for which the data have been used. The bibliographic citation may be in the form suggested by the archive or in the form required by the publication.

Bibliographical Citation

Nikula, Jouko (University of Helsinki): Social Distinctions in Modern Russia 1990 [dataset]. Version 1.0 (2020-07-16). Finnish Social Science Data Archive [distributor]. https://urn.fi/urn:nbn:fi:fsd:T-FSD3285

Deposit Requirement

Notify FSD of all publications where you have used the data by sending the citation information to user-services.fsd@tuni.fi.

Disclaimer

The original data creators and the archive bear no responsibility for any results or interpretations arising from the reuse of the data.

Related Materials

Birjukov, Dmitry & Nikula, Jouko (1999). Social distinctions in modern Russia (SDMR). Sample report 1998

Related Publications