FSD1089 Dynamics and Productivity of Research Activity in Universities 1990

Select variable

Question text

If the answer to the previous question is 'yes', which body was responsible for the review and which research area was assessed?

Frequencies

Category labels Value n
cardiovascular research review by Academy of Finland 1 14
automation technology review by Academy of Finland (AF) 2 31
hydrobiology research review by Academy of Finland 3 3
ecotoxicology research review by Academy of Finland 4 3
other international review by Academy of Finland 5 2
not relevant 8 106
can't say, misunderstanding or a non-existent review 9 11
SYSMISS 47
Displayed frequencies are not weighted

Summary statistics

Number of valid cases 170
Maximum 9
Minimum 1
Mean 6.20
Standard deviation 2.881

Study description in machine readable DDI-C 2.5 format

Creative Commons License
Metadata record is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.