FSD1089 Dynamics and Productivity of Research Activity in Universities 1990
Select variable
Question text
If the answer is 'no', please specify the weaknesses/faults of the review (first mention)
Frequencies
| Category labels | Value | n |
|---|---|---|
| review was superficial | 1 | 2 |
| conducted with too tight a time schedule | 2 | 1 |
| not objective or reviewer had own aspirations | 3 | 2 |
| not competent | 4 | 4 |
| quantitative factors too dominant | 5 | 0 |
| other | 6 | 1 |
| not relevant | 8 | 155 |
| can't say, NA, no second or third mention | 9 | 5 |
| SYSMISS | 47 | |
| Displayed frequencies are not weighted | ||
Summary statistics
| Number of valid cases | 170 |
| Maximum | 9 |
| Minimum | 1 |
| Mean | 7.75 |
| Standard deviation | 1.207 |
Study description in machine readable DDI-C 2.5 format
Metadata record is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.