Study title

Finnish Working Life Barometer: Local Government Employees 2011

Dataset ID Number

FSD2756

Persistent identifiers

https://urn.fi/urn:nbn:fi:fsd:T-FSD2756
https://doi.org/10.60686/t-fsd2756

Data Type

Quantitative

Authors

• Statistics Finland. Interview and Survey Services
• Ministry of Employment and the Economy

Other Identification/Acknowledgements

• Centre for Occupational Safety

Abstract

The annual survey studied employee opinion on the quality of working life in Finnish municipalities. Main themes were psychosocial working environment, job characteristics, pay and working time arrangements, satisfaction with the job, employment security, training and development, capacity to work, telework, and bullying and discrimination at work.

First, the respondents were asked how many years they had worked for the employer they were working for at the time, type of contract, number of persons at the workplace, and what kind of changes there had been in staff numbers and type of contracts during the past 12 months. Further questions charted whether people had been transferred from other units and whether the employer had used temporary agency employees. Questions also covered team work, whether there had been conflicts at the workplace and between what groups. Incidents of bullying, harassment and violence were charted.

Next set of questions investigated the respondent's autonomy and influence at work and other job characteristics, overtime and its compensation, flexible working time arrangements, local bargaining on working time, and R's membership in a trade union or professional association. Changes over the past year in workload and pace of work, safety at work etc were explored as well as pay and bonus systems, pay bargaining and satisfaction with pay. Psychosocial working environment was charted with a number of questions, for instance, whether there was support for trying new things and so on. One topic pertained to whether the respondents had presented any ideas to improve working conditions, products, services or working methods at the workplace and whether there had been other development initiatives. The respondents' participation in job-related training and development was investigated.

One theme pertained to job satisfaction. The respondents were asked to what extent they agreed with a number of statements relating to staff sufficiency, organisation of work, access to information, physical or mental stress etc. They were asked how likely it was that they would be dismissed or laid off, or their tasks would be changed over the next year. Views were probed on the employer's economic situation, employment situation in Finland and possible changes in working life. A number of questions investigated how the employees' capacity to work and occupational health and safety had been taken into account at the workplace, the respondents' sickness absences, illnesses and disabilities, and estimate of own mental and physical capacity to work. The respondents were asked about working from home (telework), doing work somewhere else outside of workplace and being in contact with clients or workplace outside of normal working hours. Discrimination at work based on ethnic group, age, gender and type of contract was explored as well as whether the respondents had colleagues of other nationality or ethnic origin.

Background variables included the respondent's year of birth, age, gender, region, type of municipality, education level, economic activity, status in employment, industry of employment, employer type, weekly working hours, and additional jobs. Information on age, gender, region, type of municipality and education level were obtained from registers. The other background variables were obtained from the Labour Force Survey 2011 telephone interviews which were often conducted together with the Finnish Working Life Barometer interview.

Keywords

arrangement of working time; autonomy at work; discrimination; economic recession; employees; employment contracts; job characteristics; job satisfaction; job security; local bargaining; local government officers; occupational safety; occupational training; personnel management; personnel policy; wages; working conditions; workloads

Topic Classification

• Social sciences (Fields of Science Classification)
• Social behaviour and attitudes (CESSDA Topic Classification)
• Equality, inequality and social exclusion (CESSDA Topic Classification)
• Employment (CESSDA Topic Classification)
• Labour relations/conflict (CESSDA Topic Classification)
• Working conditions (CESSDA Topic Classification)
• Occupational health (CESSDA Topic Classification)

Series

Finnish Working Life Barometers: Local Government Employees

Distributor

Finnish Social Science Data Archive

Access

The dataset is (B) available for research, teaching and study.

Data Collector

• Statistics Finland

Data Producers

• Centre for Occupational Safety. Local Government Sector Group

Time Period Covered

2011

Collection Dates

2011-09-05 – 2011-10-13

Nation

Finland

Geographical Coverage

Finland

Analysis/Observation Unit Type

Individual

Universe

Finnish-speaking local government employees, aged 18 - 64, who worked at least 10 hours a week

Time Method

Longitudinal: Trend/Repeated cross-section

Data Sources

Official Statistics of Finland (OSF): Labour force survey 2011 [e-publication]. ISSN=1798-7857. Helsinki: Statistics Finland. Access method: http://www.stat.fi/til/tyti/tie_en.html [referred: 21 September 2012].

Ministry of Employment and the Economy & Statistics Finland: Finnish Working Life Barometer 2011.

Sampling Procedure

Probability: Simple random

Simple random sample from the population register. For its Labour Force Survey 2011, Statistics Finland drew a random sample of people aged between 15 - 74 and living in Finland. From the Labour Force Survey sample, people aged 18 - 64 who had responded being employed for at least 10 hours a week were selected for the Working Life Barometer which covered all Finnish-speaking employees. This dataset contains the interview data of local government employees only (N=658). The target population was deliberately oversampled.

Collection Mode

Telephone interview: Computer-assisted (CATI)

Research Instrument

Structured questionnaire

Response Rate

81

Data File Language

Downloaded data package may contain different language versions of the same files.

The data files of this dataset are available in the following languages: Finnish.

FSD translates quantitative data into English on request, free of charge. More information on ordering data translation.

Data Version

3.0

Related Datasets

FSD2824 Finnish Working Life Barometer 2011

Weighting

There are no weight variables in the data.

Citation Requirement

The data and its creators shall be cited in all publications and presentations for which the data have been used. The bibliographic citation may be in the form suggested by the archive or in the form required by the publication.

Bibliographical Citation

Statistics Finland & Ministry of Employment and the Economy: Finnish Working Life Barometer: Local Government Employees 2011 [dataset]. Data version 3.0 (2018-07-20). Finnish Social Science Data Archive [distributor]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.60686/t-fsd2756; URN: https://urn.fi/urn:nbn:fi:fsd:T-FSD2756

Deposit Requirement

Notify FSD of all publications where you have used the data by sending the citation information to user-services.fsd@tuni.fi.

Special Terms and Conditions for Access

Users of the data shall send a copy of all research publications based on or using the data to the following two mail addresses: Tiina-Mari Monni, Työturvallisuuskeskus, Lönnrotinkatu 4 B, 00120 Helsinki, Finland; and Antti Siikanen, Haastattelu- ja tutkimuspalvelut, 00022 Tilastokeskus, Finland.

Disclaimer

The original data creators and the archive bear no responsibility for any results or interpretations arising from the reuse of the data.

Related Publications

Kunta-alan työolobarometri 2011. Työ- ja elinkeinoministeriön työolobarometrin 2011 kuntatyöpaikkojen osatarkastelu (2012) [verkkodokumentti]. Helsinki: Työturvallisuuskeskus, kuntaryhmä. Saatavilla: http://www.ttk.fi/files/2500/Kunta-alan_tyoolobarometri_2011.pdf [viitattu 13.7.2012].

Aho, Simo & Mäkiaho, Ari (2012). Työolobarometri. Lokakuu 2011. Helsinki: Työ- ja elinkeinoministeriö. Työ- ja elinkeinoministeriön julkaisuja; Työ ja yrittäjyys 29/2012. http://www.tem.fi/files/33535/TEMjul_29_2012_web.pdf.pdf [viitattu 2.8.2012].