Select variable

[fsd_no] FSD study number

[fsd_vr] FSD edition number

[fsd_id] FSD case id

[q1] I agree to the collection of my data for the above use.

[q2] Select the SRC programme you were part of.

[q3] Select the consortium you were part of.

[q5] In what kind of organisation did you work during the funding period?

[q6] Did you know the other partners of your consortium before this SRC programme?

[q7_1] On a scale from 1 to 5, assess the success of your consortium in advancing the following goals of SRC funding, based on your own experiences and impressions: Advancement of science in an important area

[q7_2] On a scale from 1 to 5, assess the success of your consortium in advancing the following goals of SRC funding, based on your own experiences and impressions: Advancement of multi-/inter-/transdisciplinary knowledge

[q7_3] On a scale from 1 to 5, assess the success of your consortium in advancing the following goals of SRC funding, based on your own experiences and impressions: High-quality research and outputs

[q7_4] On a scale from 1 to 5, assess the success of your consortium in advancing the following goals of SRC funding, based on your own experiences and impressions: Your personal or your team members' career development

[q7_5] On a scale from 1 to 5, assess the success of your consortium in advancing the following goals of SRC funding, based on your own experiences and impressions: Development of solutions to urgent societal problems

[q7_6] On a scale from 1 to 5, assess the success of your consortium in advancing the following goals of SRC funding, based on your own experiences and impressions: Partnerships and networking among key actors in Finland

[q7_7] On a scale from 1 to 5, assess the success of your consortium in advancing the following goals of SRC funding, based on your own experiences and impressions: (Other) organisational benefits for your site of research

[q7_8] On a scale from 1 to 5, assess the success of your consortium in advancing the following goals of SRC funding, based on your own experiences: Development of methods and practices for knowledge co-creation with societal stakeholders

[q8_open] Please tell us more about the success of your consortium in advancing the goals of SRC funding. (Open-ended question)

[q9_1] Assess the added value of the following features of SRC funding, based on your own experiences and impressions of the SRC programme you were part of: Large-scale research consortia with multiple partners involved

[q9_2] Assess the added value of the following features of SRC funding, based on your own experiences and impressions of the SRC programme you were part of: Internally heterogeneous research consortia with different partners involved

[q9_3] Assess the added value of the following features of SRC funding, based on your own experiences and impressions of the SRC programme you were part of: Long-term funding for consortia

[q9_4] Assess the added value of the following features of SRC funding, based on your own experiences and impressions of the SRC programme you were part of: 100 % funding share

[q9_5] Assess the added value of the following features of SRC funding, based on your own experiences and impressions of the SRC programme you were part of: Problem-driven, or solution-oriented, focus of research

[q9_6] Assess the added value of the following features of SRC funding, based on your own experiences and impressions of the SRC programme you were part of: Emphasis on societal relevance and impact in (Finnish) society

[q9_7] Assess the added value of the following features of SRC funding, based on your own experiences and impressions of the SRC programme you were part of: Resources for interaction with societal stakeholders

[q9_8] Assess the added value of the following features of SRC funding, based on your own experiences and impressions of the SRC programme you were part of: Coordinated programme activity facilitated by a programme director

[q9_9] Assess the added value of the following features of SRC funding, based on your own experiences and impressions of the SRC programme you were part of: Coordinated activity across SRC programmes

[q9_10] Assess the added value of the following features of SRC funding, based on your own experiences and impressions of the SRC programme you were part of: Guidance from the Division of Strategic Research (at the Research Council of Finland)

[q10_open] Please tell us more about the added value of SRC funding. (Open-ended question)

[q11_1] Assess the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration within your consortium. How important was the collaboration for the following aspects of your work? Selection of research focus, definition of research problems

[q11_2] Assess the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration within your consortium. As a consortium partner, how important was the collaboration for the following aspects of your work? Understanding and advancing the state of the art

[q11_3] Assess the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration within your consortium. As a consortium partner, how important was the collaboration for the following aspects of your work? Research design, data gathering, methods, tools

[q11_4] Assess the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration within your consortium. As a consortium partner, how important was the collaboration for the following aspects of your work? Application or generalisation of results

[q11_5] Assess the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration within your consortium. As a consortium partner, how important was the collaboration for the following aspects of your work? Dissemination, outreach

[q11_6] Assess the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration within your consortium. As a consortium partner, how important was the collaboration for the following aspects of your work? Supervision, working practices

[q11_7] Assess the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration within your consortium. As a consortium partner, how important was the collaboration for the following aspects of your work? Achieving societal impact

[q12_open] Please tell us more about the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration in your consortium. (Open-ended question)

[q13_1] Did your consortium have research collaboration with other SRC consortia (within or beyond the SRC programme you were part of)? No, or I am not aware of it

[q13_2] Did your consortium have research collaboration with other SRC consortia (within or beyond the SRC programme you were part of)? Yes, within the SRC programme

[q13_3] Did your consortium have research collaboration with other SRC consortia (within or beyond the SRC programme you were part of)? Yes, across the SRC programme borders

[q14_open] Please tell us more about your research collaboration with other SRC consortia. (Open-ended question)

[q15_1] Assess the consortium's interactions with societal stakeholders (those you were involved in) using the following statements: The interactions were goal-oriented.

[q15_2] Assess the consortium's interactions with societal stakeholders (those you were involved in) using the following statements: The amount/intensity of interactions was appropriate.

[q15_3] Assess the consortium's interactions with societal stakeholders (those you were involved in) using the following statements: The interactions reached key target groups.

[q15_4] Assess the consortium's interactions with societal stakeholders (those you were involved in) using the following statements: The interactions were timely.

[q15_5] Assess the consortium's interactions with societal stakeholders (those you were involved in) using the following statements: The interactions took into account the needs of different parties.

[q15_6] Assess the consortium's interactions with societal stakeholders (those you were involved in) using the following statements: It was easy to participate in the interactions.

[q15_7] Assess the consortium's interactions with societal stakeholders (those you were involved in) using the following statements: There were sufficient resources for interactions.

[q15_8] Assess the consortium's interactions with societal stakeholders (those you were involved in) using the following statements: The interactions were fruitful/relevant.

[q15_9] Assess the consortium's interactions with societal stakeholders (those you were involved in) using the following statements: The interactions with the stakeholders will continue.

[q16_open] Please tell us more about the consortium's interactions with societal stakeholders. (Open-ended question)

[q17_open] In your view, what should be done to further strengthen the societal relevance and impact of strategic research programmes? (Open-ended question)

[q18_open] Please give us feedback on the guidance and support provided by the research funder. (Open-ended question)