FSD1289 Measures of Democracy 1810-2018

The dataset is (A) openly available for all users without registration (CC BY 4.0).

Download the data

Study description in other languages

Related files

Study title

Measures of Democracy 1810-2018

Dataset ID Number


Persistent identifier


Data Type



  • Vanhanen, Tatu (University of Tampere. Department of Political Science and International Relations)


The data contain three different variables, created by Tatu Vanhanen in his long-term research, for each year from 1810 to 2018. The variables in question are political competition, political participation and the index of democratization.

The competition variable portrays the electoral success of smaller parties, that is, the percentage of votes gained by the smaller parties in parliamentary and/or presidential elections. The variable is calculated by subtracting from 100 the percentage of votes won by the largest party (the party which wins most votes) in parliamentary elections or by the party of the successful candidate in presidential elections. Depending on their importance, either parliamentary or presidential elections are used in the calculation of the variable, or both elections are used, with weights. If information on the distribution of votes is not available, or if the distribution does not portray the reality accurately, the distribution of parliamentary seats is used instead. If parliament members are elected but political parties are not allowed to take part in elections, it is assumed that one party has taken all votes or seats. In countries where parties are not banned but yet only independent candidates participate in elections, it is assumed that the share of the largest party is not over 30 percent.

The political participation variable portrays the voting turnout in each election, and is calculated as the percentage of the total population who actually voted in the election. In the case of indirect elections, only votes cast in the final election are taken into account. If electors have not been elected by citizens, only the number of actual electors is taken into account, which means that the degree of participation drops to the value 0. If an election to choose electors has been held, the participation variable is calculated from the number and distribution of votes in that election. National referendums raise the variable value by five percent and state (regional) referendums by one percent for the year they are held. Referendums can add the degree of participation at maximum by 30 percent a year. The value of the combined degree of participation cannot be higher than 70 percent, even in cases where the sum of participation and referendums would be higher than 70.

The index of democratization is formed by multiplying the competition and the participation variables and then dividing the outcome by 100.


democracy; democratization; political participation; political parties; politics; voting

Topic Classification


Individual datasets


Finnish Social Science Data Archive


The dataset is (A) openly available for all users without registration (CC BY 4.0).

Data Collector

  • Vanhanen, Tatu (University of Tampere. Department of Political Science and International Relations)
  • Lundell, Krister (Åbo Akademi University. Department of Political Science)

Time Period Covered

1810 – 2018

Collection Dates

1970 – 2019


United Arab Emirates, Afghanistan, Antigua and Barbuda, Albania, Armenia, Angola, Argentina, Austria, Australia, Azerbaijan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Barbados, Bangladesh, Belgium, Burkina Faso, Bulgaria, Bahrain, Burundi, Benin, Brunei, Bolivia, Brazil, Bahamas, Bhutan, Botswana, Belarus, Belize, Canada, Congo (Zaire), Central African Republic, Congo (Brazzaville), Switzerland, Ivory Coast (Côte d'Ivoire), Chile, Cameroon, China, Colombia, Costa Rica, Czechoslovakia, Cuba, Cape Verde, Cyprus, Czech Republic, German Democratic Republic GDR, Germany, West-Germany, Djibouti, Denmark, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Algeria, Ecuador, Estonia, Egypt, Eritrea, Spain, Ethiopia, Finland, Fiji, Micronesia, France, Gabon, United Kingdom, Grenada, Georgia, Ghana, Gambia, Guinea, Equatorial Guinea, Greece, Guatemala, Guinea-Bissau, Guyana, Honduras, Croatia, Haiti, Hungary, Indonesia, Ireland, Israel, India, Iraq, Iran, Iceland, Italy, Jamaica, Jordan, Japan, Kenya, Kyrgyzstan, Cambodia, Kiribati, Comoros, Saint Kitts and Nevis, North Korea, South Korea, Kuwait, Kazakhstan, Laos, Lebanon, Saint Lucia, Sri Lanka, Liberia, Lesotho, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Latvia, Libya, Morocco, Moldova, Madagascar, Marshall Islands, Macedonia, Mali, Myanmar (Burma), Mongolia, Mauritania, Malta, Mauritius, Maldives, Malawi, Mexico, Malaysia, Montenegro, Mozambique, Namibia, Niger, Nigeria, Nicaragua, The Netherlands, Norway, Nepal, New Zealand, Oman, Panama, Peru, Papua New Guinea, Philippines, Pakistan, Poland, Portugal, Paraguay, Qatar, Romania, Russia, Rwanda, Saudi Arabia, Solomon Islands, Seychelles, Sudan, Sweden, Singapore, Slovenia, Slovakia, Sierra Leone, Senegal, Somalia, Serbia, Suriname, Sao Tome and Principe, Russia (USSR, Soviet Union), El Salvador, Syria, Swaziland, Chad, Togo, Thailand, Tajikistan, Timor-Leste, Turkmenistan, Tunisia, Tonga, Turkey, Trinidad and Tobago, Taiwan, Tanzania, Ukraine, Uganda, United States, Uruguay, Uzbekistan, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Venezuela, Vietnam, Western Samoa, Vanuatu, Yemen, Yugoslavia, South Africa, Zambia, Zimbabwe, North Vietnam, North Yemen, South Vietnam, South Yemen

Geographical Coverage

Afghanistan, Albania, Algeria, Angola, Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Armenia, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belgium, Belize, Benin, Bhutan, Bolivia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Botswana, Brazil, Brunei, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Myanmar (Burma), Burundi, Cambodia, Cameroon, Canada, Cape Verde, Central African Republic, Chad, Chile, China, Colombia, Comoros, Congo (Brazzaville), Congo (Zaire), Costa Rica, Ivory Coast (Côte d'Ivoire), Croatia, Cuba, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Czechoslovakia, Denmark, Djibouti, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Estonia, Ethiopia, Fiji, Finland, France, Gabon, Gambia, German Democratic Republic GDR, Germany, West-Germany, Georgia, Ghana, Grenada, Greece, Guatemala, Guinea-Bissau, Guinea, Guyana, Haiti, Honduras, Hungary, Iceland, India, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Kiribati, North Korea, South Korea, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Laos, Latvia, Lebanon, Lesotho, Liberia, Libya, Lithuania, Macedonia, Luxembourg, Madagascar, Malawi, Malaysia, Maldives, Mali, Malta, Marshall Islands, Mauritania, Mauritius, Mexico, Micronesia, Moldova, Mongolia, Montenegro, Morocco, Mozambique, Namibia, Nepal, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Niger, Nigeria, Norway, Oman, Pakistan, Panama, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Romania, Russia, Russia (USSR, Soviet Union), Rwanda, Western Samoa, Sao Tome and Principe, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Serbia, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, Solomon Islands, Somalia, South Africa, Spain, Sri Lanka, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Sudan, Suriname, Swaziland, Sweden, Switzerland, Syria, Taiwan, Tajikistan, Tanzania, Thailand, Timor-Leste, Togo, Tonga, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Uganda, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, United States, Uruguay, Uzbekistan, Vanuatu, Venezuela, Vietnam, North Vietnam, South Vietnam, Yemen, North Yemen, South Yemen, Yugoslavia, Zambia, Zimbabwe

Analysis/Observation Unit Type

Political-administrative area (Country)


All independent states, their predecessors and Taiwan (excluding "the states with less than 40000 inhabitants; former states and principalities that no longer exist; former colonies; precolonial states and political communities of Asia and Africa")

Time Method

Time series

Data Sources

See related material

Sampling Procedure

Total universe/Complete enumeration

The data contains information on all states found in openly available public documents.

Collection Mode


Research Instrument

Data collection guidelines: Secondary data collection guide

Data File Language

Downloaded data package may contain different language versions of the same files.

The data files of this dataset are available in the following languages: Finnish and English.

FSD translates quantitative data into English on request, free of charge. More information on ordering data translation.

Number of Cases and Variables

632 variables and 191 cases.

Data Version


Related Datasets

FSD1216 Democratization and Power Resources 1850-2000

FSD2140 Gender-Weighted Index of Democratization 1995-2010

FSD2420 Index of Power Resources (IPR) 2007


There are no weight variables in the data.

Citation Requirement

The data and its creators shall be cited in all publications and presentations for which the data have been used. The bibliographic citation may be in the form suggested by the archive or in the form required by the publication.

Bibliographical Citation

Vanhanen, Tatu (University of Tampere): Measures of Democracy 1810-2018 [dataset]. Version 8.0 (2019-06-17). Finnish Social Science Data Archive [distributor]. http://urn.fi/urn:nbn:fi:fsd:T-FSD1289

Deposit Requirement

The user shall notify the archive of all publications where she or he has used the data.


The original data creators and the archive bear no responsibility for any results or interpretations arising from the reuse of the data.

Related Materials

See more information in the attachments of the codebook (cbF1289e.pdf)

Related Publications Tooltip

Balcázar, Carlos Felipe (2016). Long-run effects of democracy on income inequality in Latin America. The Journal of Economic Inequality 14(3), 289-307. doi:10.1007/s10888-016-9329-3

Bjorvatn, Kjetil, & Farzanegan, Mohammad Reza (2015). Natural-Resource Rents and Political Stability in the Middle East and North Africa. CESifo DICE Report, 13(3), 33-37. hdl:10419/167222

Buitenzorgy, M. & Mol, A.P.J. (2011). Does Democracy Lead to a Better Environment? Deforestation and the Democratic Transition Peak. Environmental and Resource Economics 48(1), 59-70. doi:10.1007/s10640-010-9397-y

Chang, Chia-Chien (2019). Who Pays for War? Economic Inequality, Financial Strategies, and War. PhD dissertation. University of California Santa Barbara.

Checkbook Elections?: Political Finance in Comparative Perspective (2016). Eds. Norris, Pippa & Van Es, Andrea Abel. Oxford University Press.

Democratization (2009). Eds. Haerpfer, Christian W. & Bernhagen, Patrick & Inglehart, Ronald F. & Welzel, Christian. New York: Oxford University Press.

Easton, M.R. & Montinola, G.R. (2016) Remittances, Regime Type, and Government Spending Priorities. In Studies in Comparative International Development, December 2016.

Escaleras, Monica & Register, Charles (2016). The high cost of low quality infrastructure when natural disasters strike. The Journal of Developing Areas 50(1), 103-122. doi:10.1353/jda.2016.0019

Gaibulloev, Khusrav & Piazza, James A. & Sandler, Todd (2017). Regime types and terrorism. International organization 71(3), 491-522. doi:10.1017/S0020818317000169

Galais, Carol & Blais, André (2016). Duty to Vote and Political Support in Asia. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 29(4), 631-656. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edw019

Gründler, Klaus & Krieger, Tommy (2015). Democracy and Growth: Evidence of a New Measurement [online]. CESifo Working Paper Series No. 5647. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2717460 [cited 10.7.2020].

Gründler, Klaus & Krieger, Tommy (2016). Democracy and growth: Evidence from a machine learning indicator. European Journal of Political Economy 45, 85-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2016.05.005

Hackl, Franz & Halla, Martin & Pruckner, Gerald J. (2010). Volunteering and the state. Public Choice. Published online: 30 December 2010. doi:10.1007/s11127-010-9754-y

Hayo, Bernd & Voigt, Stefan (2010). Determinants of constitutional change: Why do countries change their form of government? Journal of Comparative Economics 38(3), 283-305. doi:10.1016/j.jce.2010.07.007

Hayo, Bernd & Voigt, Stefan (2011). Endogenous constitutions: Politics and politicians matter, economic outcomes don't. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. Available online 1 October 2011. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2011.09.013

Inekwe, J. (2018). Financial crises and the extreme bounds of predictors. Empirical Economics 55, 2047-2067. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-017-1352-0

Inekwe, John Nkwoma (2019). The exploration of economic crises: parameter uncertainty and predictive ability. Scottish Journal of Political Economy 66(2), 290-313. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjpe.12199

Justino, Patricia & Martorano, Bruno (2018). Welfare spending and political conflict in Latin America, 1970-2010. World Development 107, 98-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.03.005

Kisielewski, Michael & Rosa, Juan Carlos & Asher, Jane (2010). Statistical Approaches to developing Indicators of Armed Violence. Geneva: Technical paper prepared by StatAid for Small Arms Survey.

Korolev, Alexander H. (2016). The Social Effectiveness of Political Regimes - Does Democracy Matter? Russia and The Pacific 93(3), 82-105. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2853291

Kotschy, Rainer and Uwe Sunde (2017) Inequality, Democracy, and Institutional Quality. Published in European Economic Review 91(1), pp. 209-228.

Krieger, Tommy & Gründler, Klaus (2016). Democracy and Growth: Evidence of a new measurement. Kiel und Hamburg: ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. http://hdl.handle.net/10419/145720

Kurkova, Tereza (2015). Vliv nerostneho bohatstvi na uroven demokracie v Latinske Americe. Univerzita Hradec Kralove. Filozoficka fakulta. Katedra politologie. Diplomova prace

Lertangtam, Issares (2014). Unpacking the impact of democracy on terrorism. Albany: University at Albany. State University of New York. Rockefeller College of Public Affairs and Policy. Department of Political Science.

Li, Z. (2019) Electoral Practice, Rules and Fairness: Democracy and Incentives for Respect for Physical Integrate Rights. (Master's dissertation) University College London. London.

Lynn, Richard & Vanhanen, Tatu (2006). IQ and Global Inequality. Augusta, GA: Washington Summit Publishers.

Maennig, Wolfgang & Vierhaus, Christopher (2016). Winning the Olympic host city election: key success factors. Applied Economics 49(31), 3086-3099. doi:10.1080/00036846.2016.1254339

Maennig, W., & Vierhaus, C. (2015). Who wins Olympic bids? Hamburg Contemporary Economic Discussions, (50).

Maennig, W., & Vierhaus, C. (2019). Which Countries Bid for the Olympic Games? The Role of Economic, Political, Social, and Sports Determinants. International Journal of Sport Finance, 14(2).

Mahmood, R., & Jetter, M. (2018). Communications Technology and Terrorism. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 64(1), 127-166. doi:10.1177/0022002719843989

Marineau, J., Pascoe, H., Braithwaite, A., Findley, M., & Young, J. (2018). The local geography of transnational terrorism. Conflict Management and Peace Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/0738894218789356

Masi, Tania & Ricciuti, Roberto (2019). The Heterogeneous Effect of Oil Discoveries on Democracy. Economics & Politics 31(3), pp. 374-402. doi:10.1111/ecpo.12131

Meisenberg, Gerhard (2011). National IQ and economic outcomes. Personality and Individual Differences. Corrected Proof, Aug 2011. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.06.022

Meisenberg, Gerhard & Lynn, Richard (2011). Intelligence. A Measure of Human Capital in Nations. Journal of Social, Political and Economic Studies 36(4), 421-454.

Meisenberg, Gerhard & Williams, Amandy (2008). Are acquiescent and extreme response styles related to low intelligence and education? Personality and Individual Differences 44(7), 1539-1550. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.01.010

Miller, M. K. (2015). Democratic Pieces: Autocratic Elections and Democratic Development since 1815. British Journal of Political Science. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123413000446

Munck, Gerardo L. (2009). Measuring Democracy: A Bridge between Scholarship and Politics. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Oberdabernig, Doris A. & Humer, Stefan & Crespo Cuaresma, Jesus (2017). Democracy, Geography and Model Uncertainty. Scottish Journal of Political Economy 65(2), pp. 154-185. doi:10.1111/sjpe.12140

Özmen, Yasar Pinar (2018). Hükümet sistemlerinin sosyoekonomik göstergelere göre karsilastirilmasi: Latin Amerika, Asya ve Dogu Avrupa ülkeleri [The comparison of government systems by socioeconomic indicators: Latin America, Asian And Eastern European Countries]. Gazi University. Political Science and Public Administration Department.

Panke, D. (2017). Speech is silver, silence is golden? Examining state activity in international negotiations. The Review of International Organizations, 12(1), 121-146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-016-9244-1

Prados de la Escosura, Leandro (2014). Capitalism and Human Welfare in L. Neal and J.G. Williamson (eds.), Cambridge History of Capitalism, 2 vols., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014. Vol. 2 The Spread of Capitalism: Cambridge From 1848 to 2010, pp. 501-529.

Prados de la Escosura, Leandro (2014). El desarrollo humano como libertad positiva: un panorama mundial desde 1870, Informacion Comercial Espanola 880 (2014), pp. 7-22.

Prados de la Escosura, Leandro (2015). Human Development as Positive Freedom: Latin America in Historical Perspective, Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 16 (3), pp. 342-373.

Prados de la Escosura, Leandro (2015). World Human Development, 1870-2007, Review of Income and Wealth 61 (2), pp. 220-247

Pulido, P. (2016). Minority Influence and Economic Rights. Doctoral dissertation, The Claremont Graduate University.

Quamruzzaman, A. (2017). Infrastructure Provisioning and Health Service Utilization in Africa: Does Governance Explain the Gap? Sociology of Development, 3(1), 47-69. https://doi.org/10.1525/sod.2017.3.1.47

Rindermann, Heider & Carl, Noah (2018). Human Rights: Why Countries Differ. Comparative Sociology 17(1), 29-69. https://doi.org/10.1163/15691330-12341451

Rindermann, Heiner (2007). The g-factor of international cognitive ability comparisons: the homogeneity of results in PISA, TIMSS, PIRLS and IQ-tests across nations. European Journal of Personality 21(5), p. 667-706. doi:10.1002/per.634

Rindermann, Heiner (2008). Relevance of education and intelligence at the national level for the economic welfare of people. Intelligence 36(2), 127-142. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2007.02.002

Rindermann, Heiner (2008). Relevance of education and intelligence for the political development of nations: Democracy, rule of law and political liberty. Intelligence 36(4), 306-322. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2007.09.003

Rindermann, Heiner & Meisenberg, Gerhard (2009). Relevance of education and intelligence at the national level for health: The case of HIV and AIDS. Intelligence 37(4), 383-395. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2009.03.005

Rindermann, Heiner & Sailer, Michal & Thompson, James (2009). The impact of smart fractions, cognitive ability of politicians and average competence of peoples on social development. Talent Development and Excellence 1(1), 3-25.

Saadi, Mohamed (2014). Does foreign direct investment increase exports' productivity? Evidence from developing and emerging countries. International Review of Applied Economics 28, pp 482-506. DOI:10.1080/02692171.2014.896879

Sevinc, Nurgul (2017). Are Richer Countries More Democratic? The Case of Muslim-Majority Countries (Unpublished master's thesis). TOBB University of Economics and Technology, Ankara.

Sommer, Jamie M. (2017): Grand and petty corruption: a cross-national analysis of forest loss in low- and middle-income nations, Environmental Sociology, DOI: 10.1080/23251042.2017.1348569

Spruk, Rok (2016). Institutional Transformation and the Origins of World Income Distribution. Journal of Comparative Economics 000(2016), 1-25. doi:10.1016/j.jce.2015.12.012

Suzuki, A. & Loizides, N. (2011). Escalation of interstate crises of conflictual dyads: Greece-Turkey and India-Pakistan. Cooperation and Conflict 46(1), 21-39. doi:10.1177/0010836710396770

Van Bergeijk, Peter A. G. (2017). Heterogeneity and Geography of the World Trade Collapses of the 1930s and 2000s. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie 109(1), 36-56. https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12265

Vanhanen, Tatu (2003). Democratization: A Comparative Analysis of 170 Countries. London: Routledge.

Vanhanen, Tatu (2006). Evolutionary Roots of Global Problems. Teoksessa: Aatteet, instituutiot ja poliittinen toiminta (toim. Ruostetsaari, Ilkka), 161-176. Tampere: Tampereen yliopisto. Studia Politica Tamperensis; 16.

Vanhanen, Tatu (2007). Human Diversity Reflected in Levels of Purchasing Power Parity, Democratization and the Human Condition. Mankind Quarterly 48(2), 141-155.

Vanhanen, Tatu (2008). Globaalit ongelmat. Helsinki: Terra Cognita.

Vanhanen, Tatu (2010). On the Evolutionary Limits of Democratization. Mankind Quarterly 51(1), 26-58.

Vanhanen, Tatu (2011). Globaalit haasteet. Demokratia, etninen väkivalta ja eriarvoisuus. Esitelmä Tilastoseuran Globaalit muutokset ja tilastotiede -iltapäiväseminaarissa 4.3.2010. Teoksessa: Suomen Tilastoseuran vuosikirja 2010, 104-115. Helsinki: Suomen Tilastoseura.

Vanhanen, Tatu (2011). National IQs and their demographic correlates. Personality and Individual Differences. Available online 7 September 2011. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.08.007

Vanhanen, Tatu (2012). Ethnic Conflicts. Their Biological Roots in Ethnic Nepotism. London: Ulster Institute for Social Research.

Vanhanen, Tatu (2013). Miksi Kiina lähtee lentoon ja Kongo ei? Yhteiskuntien älykkyyserot ja niiden huomiointi kehityksessä. Helsinki: East-West Books.

Vanhanen, Tatu (2014). Global Inequality as a Consequence of Human Diversity. A New Theory Tested by Empirical Evidence. London: Ulster Institute for Social Research.

Vanhanen, Tatu & Lynn, Richard (2004). The Roots of Global Disparaties in Human Diversity. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Hilton Chicago and the Palmer House Hilton, Chicago, IL, Sep 02, 2004. http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p61701_index.html [2009-05-26].

Vlcek, Vaclav (2021): How Many and Why? Size Variation of National Delegations to Plenary Meetings of International Organizations. Mezinárodní vztahy, Vol. 56, No. 1, s. 7-33, <doi:10.32422/mv-cjir.1684>.

Wigley, S. & Akkoyunlu-Wigley, A. (2011). Do electoral institutions have an impact on population health? Public Choice 148(3-4), 595-610. doi:10.1007/s11127-010-9686-6

Wigley, S. & Akkoyunlu-Wigley, A. (2011). The impact of regime type on health: Does redistribution explain everything. World Politics 63(4), 647-677. doi:10.1017/S0043887111000177

Wigley, S. & Akkoyunlu-Wigley, A. (2017). The impact of democracy and media freedom on under-5 mortality, 1961-2011. Social Science & Medicine 190, 237-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.08.023

Wilson, Ben & Dyson, Tim (2017). Democracy and the demographic transition. Democratization 24(4), 594-612. DOI: 10.1080/13510347.2016.1194396

Woodley, Michael M. (2012) Corrigendum to Inbreeding depression and IQ in a study of 72 countries. In: Intelligence 40(6):639-641. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2012.08.002

Zuazu Bermejo, I. (2019). The economic aftermath of institutions. PhD.

Zuazu, I. (2018). Electoral Systems and Income Inequality: A Tale of Political Equality. hdl:10810/30206

Zuazu, Izaskun (2019). The growth effect of democracy and technology: An industry disaggregated approach. European Journal of Political Economy 56, 115-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2018.07.009

Study description in machine readable DDI 2.0 format

Creative Commons License
Metadata record is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.