FSD2646 Finnish Working Life Barometer 2007
The dataset is (B) available for research, teaching and study.
Download the data
Study description in other languages
Related files
Study title
Finnish Working Life Barometer 2007
Dataset ID Number
FSD2646
Persistent identifiers
https://urn.fi/urn:nbn:fi:fsd:T-FSD2646https://doi.org/10.60686/t-fsd2646
Data Type
Quantitative
Authors
- Ministry of Labour
- Statistics Finland
Abstract
The annual survey studied employee opinion on the quality of working life in Finland. Main themes were psychosocial working environment, job characteristics, pay systems, job satisfaction, employment security, training and development, capacity to work, and bullying and discrimination at work.
First, the respondents were asked how many years they had worked for the employer they were working for at the time, type of contract, number of persons at the workplace, what kind of changes there had been in staff numbers, working hours, and contracts over the past 12 months, and whether people had been transferred to other units. Further questions covered team work, and whether there had been conflicts at the workplace, between what groups and whether the conflicts had decreased or increased over the past 12 months. Incidents of bullying and violence were charted.
Next set of questions covered the respondent's autonomy at work and other job characteristics, overtime and its compensation, time bank arrangements, and R's membership in a trade union or professional association. Changes over the past year in workload, physical or mental stress, in access to training etc were explored as well as pay and bonus systems, and satisfaction with pay. Psychosocial working environment was charted with a number of questions, for instance, whether employees were treated equally, how supervisors handled development ideas suggested by subordinates and so on. One topic pertained to whether the respondents had presented any ideas to improve working conditions, products, services or working methods at the workplace and whether there had been other development initiatives. The respondents' participation in job-related training and development was investigated.
One theme pertained to job satisfaction. The respondents were asked to what extent they agreed with a number of statements relating to staff sufficiency, organisation of work, access to information, physical or mental stress etc. They were asked how likely it was that they would be dismissed or laid off, or their tasks or working hours would be changed over the next year. Opinions on the employment situation in Finland and on changes happening in working life were charted. A number of questions investigated how the employees' capacity to work and occupational safety had been taken into account at the workplace, the respondents' sickness absences, and estimate of own mental and physical capacity to work. Discrimination at work based on ethnic group, age, gender and type of contract was explored. Finally, the respondents were asked whether they had done their main work from home or somewhere else outside of workplace (telework).
Background variables included the respondent's gender, age, major region (NUTS2), type of municipality, education, occupational status, industry of employment, employer type, status in employment, economic activity, weekly working hours, and additional jobs. Information on age, gender, major region, type of municipality and education level were obtained from registers. Other background variables were obtained from the Labour Force Survey 2007 telephone interviews which were often conducted together with the Finnish Working Life Barometer interview.
Keywords
arrangement of working time; autonomy at work; discrimination; employees; employment contracts; job characteristics; job satisfaction; job security; occupational training; personnel management; personnel policy; telework; wages; working conditions
Topic Classification
- Social sciences (Fields of Science Classification)
- Social behaviour and attitudes (CESSDA Topic Classification)
- Equality, inequality and social exclusion (CESSDA Topic Classification)
- Employment (CESSDA Topic Classification)
- Labour relations/conflict (CESSDA Topic Classification)
- Working conditions (CESSDA Topic Classification)
- Occupational health (CESSDA Topic Classification)
Series
Finnish Working Life BarometersDistributor
Finnish Social Science Data Archive
Access
The dataset is (B) available for research, teaching and study.
Data Collector
- Statistics Finland
Time Period Covered
2007
Collection Dates
2007-09-03 – 2007-10-11
Nation
Finland
Geographical Coverage
Finland
Analysis/Observation Unit Type
Individual
Universe
Finnish-speaking employees aged 18-64 who work at least 10 hours a week
Time Method
Longitudinal: Trend/Repeated cross-section
Data Sources
Official Statistics of Finland (OSF): Labour force survey 2007 [e-publication]. ISSN=1798-7857. Helsinki: Statistics Finland. Access method: http://www.stat.fi/til/tyti/tie_en.html [referred: 16 Nov 2011].
Sampling Procedure
Probability: Simple random
Simple random sample from the population register. For its Labour Force Survey 2007, Statistics Finland drew a random sample of people aged between 15 - 74 and living in Finland. From the Labour Force Survey sample, Finnish-speaking employees who had responded being employed for at least 10 hours a week were selected for the Working Life Barometer.
Collection Mode
Telephone interview
Research Instrument
Structured questionnaire
Response Rate
83.2
Data File Language
Downloaded data package may contain different language versions of the same files.
The data files of this dataset are available in the following languages: Finnish and English.
FSD translates quantitative data into English on request, free of charge. More information on ordering data translation.
Number of Cases and Variables
138 variables and 1480 cases.
Data Version
2.0
Related Datasets
FSD2752 Finnish Working Life Barometer: Local Government Employees 2007
Weighting
There are no weight variables in the data.
Citation Requirement
The data and its creators shall be cited in all publications and presentations for which the data have been used. The bibliographic citation may be in the form suggested by the archive or in the form required by the publication.
Bibliographical Citation
Ministry of Labour & Statistics Finland: Finnish Working Life Barometer 2007 [dataset]. Data version 2.0 (2018-07-20). Finnish Social Science Data Archive [distributor]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.60686/t-fsd2646; URN: https://urn.fi/urn:nbn:fi:fsd:T-FSD2646
Deposit Requirement
Notify FSD of all publications where you have used the data by sending the citation information to user-services.fsd@tuni.fi.
Disclaimer
The original data creators and the archive bear no responsibility for any results or interpretations arising from the reuse of the data.
Related Materials
Ylöstalo, Pekka & Jukka, Pirkko (2008). Työolobarometri. Lokakuu 2007. Helsinki: Työ- ja elinkeinoministeriö. Työ- ja elinkeinoministeriön julkaisuja; Työ ja yrittäjyys 16/2008. http://www.tem.fi/files/19623/TEM16_2008_aktiivinen.pdf [viitattu 3.8.2011].
Related Publications
Ylöstalo, Pekka & Jukka, Pirkko (2008). Työolobarometri. Lokakuu 2007. Helsinki: Työ- ja elinkeinoministeriö. Työ- ja elinkeinoministeriön julkaisuja; Työ ja yrittäjyys 16/2008.
Kunta-alan työolobarometri 2007. Työ- ja elinkeinoministeriön tyolobarometrin 2007 kuntatyöpaikkojen osatarkastelu (2008) [verkkodokumentti]. Helsinki: Työturvallisuuskeskus, kuntaryhmä. Saatavilla: http://www.ttk.fi/files/95/Kuntabaro2007.pdf [Viitattu 13.7.2012] .
Uronen, Katri (2012). Nuoret aikuiset. Innokkaita työmyyriä vai työelämän uuvuttamia muuleja? Nuorten aikuisten kokemukset työelämän epävarmuudesta ja työhyvinvoinnista Suomessa suhteessa muihin palkansaajiin aikajaksolla 2005-2010. Turku: Turun yliopisto. Sosiaalipolitiikan pro gradu -tutkielma.
Laukkanen, E. (2012). Työn laatu Suomessa: Mitä työ- ja elinkeinoministeriön työolobarometrista koostetusta laatuindeksistä jää käteen? Työelämän tutkimus 2/2012, 188-197.
Nikula, Jouko (2016). Middle Class and Middle-class Jobs. Victims of Technological Progress? Sociological Problems. 2016 / Special issue 48/2016, 46-61. Institute for the Study of Societies and Knowledge at the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences in conjunction with the Bulgarian SociologicalAssociation. ISSN: 0324-1572
Study description in machine readable DDI-C 2.5 format
Metadata record is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.