FSD2648 Finnish Working Life Barometer 2009
The dataset is (B) available for research, teaching and study.
Download the data
Study description in other languages
Related files
Study title
Finnish Working Life Barometer 2009
Dataset ID Number
FSD2648
Persistent identifiers
https://urn.fi/urn:nbn:fi:fsd:T-FSD2648https://doi.org/10.60686/t-fsd2648
Data Type
Quantitative
Authors
- Ministry of Employment and the Economy
- Statistics Finland
Abstract
The annual survey studied employee opinion on the quality of working life in Finland. Main themes were psychosocial working environment, job characteristics, pay systems, satisfaction with the job, employment security, training and development, capacity to work, and bullying and discrimination at work. The year 2009 study contained new questions on cooperation negotiations.
First, the respondents were asked how many years they had worked for the employer they were working for at the time, type of contract, number of persons at the workplace, and what kind of changes there had been in staff numbers, working hours, contracts, and tasks during the past 12 months, and whether people had been or transferred to other units. A number of questions pertained to co-operation negotiations, their process and results. Further questions covered team work, whether there had been conflicts at the workplace, between what groups and whether the conflicts had decreased or increased over the past 12 months. Incidents of bullying and violence were charted.
Next set of questions investigated the respondent's autonomy at work and other job characteristics, overtime and its compensation, flexible working time arrangements, and R's membership in a trade union or professional association. Changes over the past year in workload, physical or mental stress, in access to training etc were explored as well as pay and bonus systems, and satisfaction with pay. Psychosocial working environment was charted with a number of questions, for instance, whether employees were treated equally, was there support for trying new things and so on. One topic pertained to whether the respondents had presented any ideas to improve working conditions, products, services or working methods at the workplace and whether there had been other development initiatives. The respondents' participation in job-related training and development was investigated.
One theme pertained to job satisfaction. The respondents were asked to what extent they agreed with a number of statements relating to staff sufficiency, organisation of work, access to information, physical or mental stress etc. They were asked how likely it was that they would be dismissed or laid off, or their tasks or working hours would be changed over the next year. Views were probed on the employer's financial situation, effects of the economic recession on the workplace, employment situation in Finland and possible changes in working life. A number of questions investigated how the employees' capacity to work and occupational safety had been taken into account at the workplace, the respondents' sickness absences, and estimate of own mental and physical capacity to work. Discrimination at work based on ethnic group, age, gender and type of contract was explored.
Background variables included the respondent's age, gender, major region (NUTS2), type of municipality, education, economic activity, status in employment, industry of employment, occupational group, employer type, weekly working hours, and additional jobs. Information on age, gender, major region, type of municipality and education level were obtained from registers. The other background variables were obtained from the Labour Force Survey 2009 telephone interviews which were often conducted together with the Finnish Working Life Barometer interview.
Keywords
arrangement of working time; autonomy at work; discrimination; economic recession; employees; employment contracts; job characteristics; job satisfaction; job security; occupational training; personnel management; personnel policy; wages; working conditions; workloads
Topic Classification
- Social sciences (Fields of Science Classification)
- Social behaviour and attitudes (CESSDA Topic Classification)
- Equality, inequality and social exclusion (CESSDA Topic Classification)
- Employment (CESSDA Topic Classification)
- Labour relations/conflict (CESSDA Topic Classification)
- Working conditions (CESSDA Topic Classification)
- Occupational health (CESSDA Topic Classification)
Series
Finnish Working Life BarometersDistributor
Finnish Social Science Data Archive
Access
The dataset is (B) available for research, teaching and study.
Data Collector
- Statistics Finland
Time Period Covered
2009
Collection Dates
2009-09-07 – 2009-10-08
Nation
Finland
Geographical Coverage
Finland
Analysis/Observation Unit Type
Individual
Universe
Finnish-speaking employees aged 18-64 who worked at least 10 hours a week
Time Method
Longitudinal: Trend/Repeated cross-section
Data Sources
Official Statistics of Finland (OSF): Labour force survey 2009 [e-publication]. ISSN=1798-7857. Helsinki: Statistics Finland. Access method: http://www.stat.fi/til/tyti/tie_en.html [referred: 23 Nov 2011].
Sampling Procedure
Probability: Simple random
Simple random sample from the population register. For its Labour Force Survey 2009, Statistics Finland drew a random sample of people aged between 15 - 74 and living in Finland. From the Labour Force Survey sample, Finnish-speaking employees who had responded being employed for at least 10 hours a week were selected for the Working Life Barometer.
Collection Mode
Telephone interview
Research Instrument
Structured questionnaire
Response Rate
83.6
Data File Language
Downloaded data package may contain different language versions of the same files.
The data files of this dataset are available in the following languages: Finnish.
FSD translates quantitative data into English on request, free of charge. More information on ordering data translation.
Data Version
2.0
Related Datasets
FSD2754 Finnish Working Life Barometer: Local Government Employees 2009
Weighting
There are no weight variables in the data.
Citation Requirement
The data and its creators shall be cited in all publications and presentations for which the data have been used. The bibliographic citation may be in the form suggested by the archive or in the form required by the publication.
Bibliographical Citation
Ministry of Employment and the Economy & Statistics Finland: Finnish Working Life Barometer 2009 [dataset]. Version 2.0 (2018-07-20). Finnish Social Science Data Archive [distributor]. https://urn.fi/urn:nbn:fi:fsd:T-FSD2648
Deposit Requirement
Notify FSD of all publications where you have used the data by sending the citation information to user-services.fsd@tuni.fi.
Disclaimer
The original data creators and the archive bear no responsibility for any results or interpretations arising from the reuse of the data.
Related Materials
Ylöstalo, Pekka & Jukka, Pirkko (2010). Työolobarometri. Lokakuu 2009. Helsinki: Työ- ja elinkeinoministeriö. Työ- ja elinkeinoministeriön julkaisuja; Työ ja yrittäjyys 34/2010. http://www.tem.fi/files/27208/TEM_34_2010_netti.pdf [viitattu 3.8.2011].
Related Publications
Ylöstalo, Pekka & Jukka, Pirkko (2010). Työolobarometri. Lokakuu 2009. Helsinki: Työ- ja elinkeinoministeriö. Työ- ja elinkeinoministeriön julkaisuja; Työ ja yrittäjyys 34/2010.
Kunta-alan työolobarometri 2009. Työ- ja elinkeinoministeriön työolobarometrin 2009 kuntatyöpaikkojen osatarkastelu (2010) [verkkodokumentti]. Helsinki: Työturvallisuuskeskus, kuntaryhmä. Saatavilla: http://www.ttk.fi/files/1414/Kunta-alan_tyoolobarometri_2009.pdf [viitattu 13.7.2012].
Uronen, Katri (2012). Nuoret aikuiset. Innokkaita työmyyriä vai työelämän uuvuttamia muuleja? Nuorten aikuisten kokemukset työelämän epävarmuudesta ja työhyvinvoinnista Suomessa suhteessa muihin palkansaajiin aikajaksolla 2005-2010. Turku: Turun yliopisto. Sosiaalipolitiikan pro gradu -tutkielma.
Karhinen-Soppi, Anu (2013). Työpaikkakiusaaminen työhyvinvointiongelmana.Tutkielma henkisen ja fyysisen työpaikkakiusaamisen sekä työhyvinvoinnin välisestä yhteydestä terveydenhuollossa, sosiaalialalla ja opetusalalla. Itä-Suomen yliopisto. Yhteiskuntatieteiden ja kauppatieteiden tiedekunta / Yhteiskuntatieteiden laitos. Sosiologian pro gradu -tutkielma.
Koivula, Aki (2015): Joustava työaika, parempi työ? Työajan ja työn laadullisten tekijöiden tarkastelua vuosina 2009-2013. Teoksessa: Koivula, Aki & Oksanen, Janna & Räsänen, Pekka (eds) Economic and Sociological Studies in Turbulent Times. Working Papers in Economic Sociology (VII). University of Turku: Turku, 1-26.
Laukkanen, E. (2012). Työn laatu Suomessa: Mitä työ- ja elinkeinoministeriön työolobarometrista koostetusta laatuindeksistä jää käteen? Työelämän tutkimus 2/2012, 188-197.
Silvennoinen, H. & Nori, H. (2017) In the Margins of Workplace Learning. Journal of Workplace Learning 29 (3), 185-199.
Silvennoinen, H. & Nori, H. (2012) Ikääntyvien koulutus monimuotoistuvassa työelämässä. Finnish Journal for Adult Education, Aikuiskasvatus 32 (3), 177-189.
Silvennoinen, H. & Nori, H. (2014) Koulutuksen ja oppimisen marginaalissa. Teoksessa K. Brunila & U. Isopahkala-Bouret (toim.) Marginaalin voima, 102-127. Helsinki: Kansanvalistusseura.
Laine, P. & Lindberg, M. & Silvennoinen, H. (2016) Työhyvinvoinnista tarvitaan väestötason seurantatietoa. Työhyvinvoinnin käsite ja mittaamisen problematisointia ja kehittelyä. Hallinnon tutkimus 35 (4), 257-273.
Study description in machine readable DDI-C 2.5 format
Metadata record is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.