FSD3209 Finnish Self-Report Delinquency Study 2016
The dataset is (C) available for research only (including Master's, doctoral and Polytechnic/University of Applied Sciences Master's theses). The dataset may not be used for teaching, study (e.g. seminar papers, essays) or other theses (Bachelor's theses or equivalent).
Download the data
Study description in other languages
Related files
Study title
Finnish Self-Report Delinquency Study 2016
Dataset ID Number
FSD3209
Persistent identifiers
https://urn.fi/urn:nbn:fi:fsd:T-FSD3209https://doi.org/10.60686/t-fsd3209
Data Type
Quantitative
Authors
- Kivivuori, Janne (University of Helsinki. Institute of Criminology and Legal Policy)
- Näsi, Matti (University of Helsinki. Institute of Criminology and Legal Policy)
Abstract
The survey studied the extent, frequency and nature of self-reported offending among young people in Finland as well as their attitudes towards crime and experiences of being victims.
Questions covered truancy, making graffiti, damaging the school's or other property, theft and shoplifting, motor vehicle theft, breaking and entering, copyright infringement online, bullying and cyberbullying, taking part in a fight, assault, robbery, possession of a weapon, alcohol use, drink-driving, and drug use. If the respondents admitted to having done any of the acts mentioned, they were asked whether they had done it in the previous 12 months and how many times. Relating to some of the offences, the respondents were also presented with specifying questions about the last time they had committed the act, for example, whether they had acted alone, whether they had been drunk at the time, whether the act had been revenge for some previous incident, what they had stolen, and whether their motive for the offence had been discriminatory.
The respondents were also asked whether they had been a victim of criminal damage, robbery, theft, bullying, threats of violence, assault, hate crime, parental corporal punishment, cyberbullying and sexual harassment by adults or other young people. If the respondents had been a victim of any of the acts, they were asked whether they had experienced it in the previous 12 months and how many times. Relating to some of the experiences, the respondents were also presented with specifying questions about the last time they had been a victim of the crime, for instance, whether the perpetrator had been male or female, how old the perpetrator had been, what his/her ethnic background had been, whether the respondent had sustained injuries, and what had been stolen. Relating to experiences of violence, the respondents were further presented with a list of people (e.g. sibling, friend, mother, father, unknown adult, teacher, coach/instructor) and asked whether any of them had physically assaulted them (hit, kicked, or used a weapon).
Family and circumstances at home were surveyed with questions about the extent to which parents supported and were interested in the respondent's life. Relating to leisure time, questions probed how often the respondents were away from home in the evenings, went to parties with alcohol involved, spent long periods of time online, played violent games, watched violent films etc. Questions about the neighbourhood of residence and school investigated the prevalence of graffiti and vandalism in the neighbourhood, and the prevalence of vandalism and disruptive behaviour at school. The respondents were also asked whether their friends had used cannabis, shoplifted or been in a fight in a public place.
The respondents' personality traits were charted by asking them the extent they agreed with statements relating to impulsiveness, risk-seeking, and being considerate of others. The respondents were also asked how much insecurity they felt over different issues, such as environmental threats and disasters, crime, or hate speech on the Internet. The respondents' agreement with a variety of attitudinal statements about law-breaking, immigration and multiculturalism, religion, and revenge was surveyed.
The respondents were asked whether the school personnel had searched their belongings for or confiscated items or substances capable of harming others during the school year. The number of times this had happened was charted as well as who had searched for or confiscated the items, whether force had been used, and whether the respondent had tried to resist. Finally, the respondents were asked how much they appreciated different types of people, whether they personally wanted to be famous or admired and to achieve great things, and how happy and satisfied with life they had been in the previous six months.
Background variables included, among others, the respondent's gender and age as well as the number of years they had lived in their municipality of residence, number of siblings, languages spoken at home, parents' economic activity, family's financial situation and type of the municipality of residence.
Keywords
assault; bullying; burglary; crime and security; crime victims; criminal damage; cyberbullying; drinking behaviour; drug offences; juvenile delinquency; offences; personality traits; robbery; schoolchildren; schoolteachers; shopifting; theft; youth
Topic Classification
- Social sciences (Fields of Science Classification)
- Youth (CESSDA Topic Classification)
- Crime and law enforcement (CESSDA Topic Classification)
Series
Finnish Self-Report Delinquency StudyDistributor
Finnish Social Science Data Archive
Access
The dataset is (C) available only for research including master's theses.
Data Collector
- University of Helsinki. Institute of Criminology and Legal Policy
Time Period Covered
2016
Collection Dates
2016-02 – 2016-05
Nation
Finland
Geographical Coverage
Finland
Analysis/Observation Unit Type
Individual
Universe
Pupils in the ninth grade of basic education in Finland
Time Method
Longitudinal: Trend/Repeated cross-section
Sampling Procedure
Probability: Cluster: Simple random
The sampling unit was the school. Sufficient representation of different municipality types was ensured in the sampling design. Differing school sizes were also taken into consideration in the sample.
Collection Mode
Self-administered questionnaire: Web-based (CAWI)
Research Instrument
Structured questionnaire
Data File Language
Downloaded data package may contain different language versions of the same files.
The data files of this dataset are available in the following languages: English and Finnish.
FSD translates quantitative data into English on request, free of charge. More information on ordering data translation.
Number of Cases and Variables
510 variables and 6061 cases.
Data Version
2.0
Completeness of Data and Restrictions
The following information was edited or removed from the data to prevent identification. Information on the respondents' classes was removed from the data as well as the "other, which" type of open-ended questions from the following variables: q4 (other country of birth), q11 (other language spoken at home), q13 (other country of birth of father), q15 (other country of birth of mother), and q56 (other religion). In the age variable, rare ages among ninth graders were marked as missing information (ages 15-17 were left intact). The values exceeding 17 in the variable charting the years lived in the municipality of residence were also marked as missing. Some values in the country of birth variables q4_1, q13_1 and q15_1 were combined. Identifiers, such as names, were removed from the open-ended variables left in the data. Any changes were marked with [square brackets].
Specifying questions c-h for variable q46 (experiences of cyberbullying) are missing from the data.
Weighting
Analysis weight: the weighting adjusts for sampling and non-response bias.
Citation Requirement
The data and its creators shall be cited in all publications and presentations for which the data have been used. The bibliographic citation may be in the form suggested by the archive or in the form required by the publication.
Bibliographical Citation
Kivivuori, Janne (University of Helsinki) & Näsi, Matti (University of Helsinki): Finnish Self-Report Delinquency Study 2016 [dataset]. Version 2.0 (2018-10-31). Finnish Social Science Data Archive [distributor]. https://urn.fi/urn:nbn:fi:fsd:T-FSD3209
Deposit Requirement
Notify FSD of all publications where you have used the data by sending the citation information to user-services.fsd@tuni.fi.
Disclaimer
The original data creators and the archive bear no responsibility for any results or interpretations arising from the reuse of the data.
Related Publications
Näsi, Matti (2016). Nuorten rikoskäyttäytyminen ja uhrikokemukset 2016. Kriminologian ja oikeuspolitiikan instituutin katsauksia 18/2016. Helsingin yliopisto.
Näsi, Matti & Tanskanen, Maiju (2017). Nuorisorikollisuus. Teoksessa Rikollisuustilannekatsaus 2016. Kriminologian ja oikeuspolitiikan instituutin katsauksia 22/2017. Helsingin yliopisto, 201-218.
Mikkola, Reetta (2017). Nuoret ja tarkastustoimenpiteet koulussa. Sosiologian pro gradu -tutkielma. Helsingin yliopisto.
Kivivuori, Janne & Aaltonen, Mikko & Näsi, Matti & Suonpää, Karoliina & Danielsson, Petri (2018). Kriminologia: rikollisuus ja kontrolli muuttuvassa yhteiskunnassa. Helsinki: Gaudeamus.
Pötsönen, Milla (2022). Kiusaamista koulussa, väkivaltaa kadulla. Koulukiusaaminen ja väkivalta epätoivottuna käyttäytymisenä yläkoululaisten keskuudessa. Sosiaalityön pro gradu -tutkielma. Rovaniemi: Lapin yliopisto.
Rajajärvi, Jenina (2023). Sosiaalinen kontrolli ja nuorisorikollisuus. Epävirallisen sosiaalisen kontrollin yhteys rikolliseen käyttäytymiseen suomalaisilla 15-16-vuotiailla nuorilla. Turun yliopisto: pro gradu -tutkielma. https://www.utupub.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/174703/Rajajarvi_Jenina_opinnayte.pdf?sequence=1
Aarnio, Paula (2023). Sosiaalisen ympäristön huono-osaisuuden yhteys nuorten rikollisuuteen. Sosiologian pro gradu -tutkielma. Turku: Turun yliopisto.
Study description in machine readable DDI-C 2.5 format
Metadata record is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.