Aineiston nimi

ISSP 2004: Citizenship: Finnish Data

Aineistonumero

FSD2039

Pysyvät tunnisteet

https://urn.fi/urn:nbn:fi:fsd:T-FSD2039
https://doi.org/10.60686/t-fsd2039

Aineiston laatu

Kvantitatiivinen aineisto

Tekijät

• International Social Survey Programme (ISSP)
• Blom, Raimo (University of Tampere. Department of Sociology and Social Psychology)
• Melin, Harri (University of Turku. Department of Sociology)
• Tanskanen, Eero (Statistics Finland)

Muut tekijät

• Borg, Sami (University of Tampere. Finnish Social Science Data Archive)
• Nieminen, Markku (Statistics Finland)

Sisällön kuvaus

The survey covers citizen participation, and attitudes towards participation in Finland. Opinions as to what it takes to be a good citizen (e.g. always obey laws, never evade taxes, willingness to serve in the military) were charted. Respondents were asked whether religious extremists, people who want to overthrow the government or people prejudiced against any racial or ethnic group should be allowed to hold public meetings. A set of questions charted respondents' political and social participation, for example, taking part in a demonstration or expressing views in the media. Membership and level of activity in different kinds of groups or associations (e.g. political parties, church, voluntary associations) were investigated.

One theme covered people's rights in a democracy: respondents were asked to rate the importance of all citizens having adequate standard of living, of being allowed to participate in decision-making, or that authorities respect the rights of minorities etc. Political efficacy was studied by asking whether the government cares what respondents think. The degree to which respondents understand political issues was queried. Further questions explored citizen influence on legislature, respondents' interest in politics, and trust in other people.

The survey also investigated opinions on international issues, like whether the UN has too much or too little power, and which bodies should be involved in the decision-making in international organizations. Respondents were also asked whether the UN should intervene if a country violates human rights. Opinions of Finnish politics were studied by asking about political parties, referendums, how honest the counting and reporting of votes had been in the last national elections, and how fair the campaign opportunities of the candidates and parties. Opinions on the degree of commitment and corruption in the Finnish public service were examined. Some questions focused on the functioning of democracy in Finland at the moment, 10 years ago and 10 years from now. Views were probed on whether the government should restrict democratic rights under any circumstances. Frequency of following political news/content in different media was studied, likewise respect and tolerance towards other people.

Background variables included respondent's gender, year of birth, marital status, education, occupation, employment status, weekly working hours, trade union membership, employer sector, industry of employment, social class, personal and household income, household composition, type of community, region, and spouse's education, occupation, weekly working hours, employer sector and industry of employment.

Asiasanat

attitudes; citizen participation; corruption; democracy; international cooperation; political influence; political interest; political participation; public administration; voluntary organizations

Tieteenala/Aihealue

• Social sciences (OKM:n tieteenalaluokitus)
• International politics and organisations (CESSDAn aihepiiriluokitus)
• Political behaviour and attitudes (CESSDAn aihepiiriluokitus)

Sarja

ISSP (International Social Survey Programme)

Jakelija

Finnish Social Science Data Archive

Käyttöoikeudet

The dataset is (B) available for research, teaching and study.

Kerääjät

• Statistics Finland

Tuottajat

• University of Tampere. Department of Sociology and Social Psychology
• Statistics Finland
• Finnish Social Science Data Archive

Ajallinen kattavuus

2004

Aineistonkeruun ajankohta

2004-09-08 – 2004-11-15

Maa

Finland

Kohdealue

Finland

Havaintoyksikkötyyppi

Individual

Perusjoukko/otos

People aged 15-74 resident in Finland

Tutkimuksen aikaulottuvuus

Longitudinal: Trend/Repeated cross-section

Lähdeaineistot

Province code and mother tongue variables are based on register information.

Otantamenetelmä

Probability: Systematic random

Systematic random sampling from Finland's population register. Sorting order: municipal code and year of birth.

The sample size was 2,500 persons, of whom 94.5% were Finnish-speaking and 5.5% Swedish-speaking. Nine persons lived abroad or their address was unknown. The questionnaire was thus sent to 2,491 persons. The number of returned questionnaires was 1,354. Non-response was 1,137 persons, of whom 9 refused and 1,128 did not participate for other reasons.

Keruumenetelmä

Self-administered questionnaire: Paper

Keruuväline tai –ohje

Structured questionnaire

Vastausprosentti

54.4

Datatiedostojen kieli

Aineistopaketti voi sisältää samoja tiedostoja eri kielisinä.

Aineisto sisältää datatiedostoja seuraavilla kielillä: suomi.

Tietoarkisto kääntää kvantitatiivisia datatiedostoja englanniksi. Lisätietoja käännöspyynnön jättämisestä.

Datan versio

3.0

Katso myös

FSD2998 ISSP 2014: Citizenship II: Finnish Data

Painokertoimet

The data contain two weight variables, which were created using a calibration method in order to improve estimation efficiency and to correct non-response bias. The weights are based on the following population distributions: 1) gender, 2) age groups (15-24, 25-34, ..., 65-74), 3) NUTS3 areas so that Greater Helsinki area was treated separately, and 4) municipality type (urban, semi-urban, rural). The first weight variable (paino_1) weights the results to match the whole Finnish population (the sum of the weights equals to the size of the Finnish population). The second weight variable (paino_2) does not produce this kind of extension (the weighted mean is 1 and the sum equals to the number of cases). Both variables are based on the same calibration process, only the scale is different.

Viittausvaatimus

The data and its creators shall be cited in all publications and presentations for which the data have been used. The bibliographic citation may be in the form suggested by the archive or in the form required by the publication.

Malliviittaus

International Social Survey Programme (ISSP) & Blom, Raimo (University of Tampere) & Melin, Harri (University of Turku) & Tanskanen, Eero (Statistics Finland): ISSP 2004: Citizenship: Finnish Data [dataset]. Version 3.0 (2018-07-17). Finnish Social Science Data Archive [distributor]. https://urn.fi/urn:nbn:fi:fsd:T-FSD2039

Julkaisusta tiedottaminen

Notify FSD of all publications where you have used the data by sending the citation information to user-services.fsd@tuni.fi.

Varaumat

The original data creators and the archive bear no responsibility for any results or interpretations arising from the reuse of the data.

Muu materiaali

Katso ladattavat tiedostot sivun ylälaidasta.

ZA3950: International Social Survey Programme: Citizenship - ISSP 2004 data and further information in English available at GESIS pages.

Käytön ja kuvailun oheismateriaalit

The classification of occupations used in the data set: ISCO-88 (COM) - the European Union variant of ISCO-88

Julkaisut aineistosta

Suomen demokratiaindikaattorit (2006). Toim. Sami Borg. Helsinki: Oikeusministeriö. Oikeusministeriön julkaisu 2006:1.

Wiberg, Matti (2006). Politiikka Suomessa. Helsinki: WSOY.

Siisiäinen, Martti (2009). Differentia Specifica of Voluntary Organizing in Finland. - In: Civic Mind and Good Citizenship. Comparative Perspectives (ed. Annamari Konttinen), 87-113. Tampere: Tampere University Press.

Oinonen, Eriikka & Blom, Raimo & Melin, Harri (2005). Onni on olla suomalainen? Kansallinen identiteetti ja kansalaisuus. Tampere: Yhteiskuntatieteellinen tietoarkisto. Yhteiskuntatieteellisen tietoarkiston julkaisuja; 1.

Melin, Harri (2009). Civic Mind and the Legitimacy of Finnish Democracy. - In: Civic Mind and Good Citizenship. Comparative Perspectives (ed. Annamari Konttinen), 57-86. Tampere: Tampere University Press.

Lagerspetz, Mikko (2009).Still Citizen vs. State? Post-Communist Prospects for Democracy in Europe. - In: Civic Mind and Good Citizenship. Comparative Perspectives (ed. Annamari Konttinen), 147-168. Tampere: Tampere University Press.

Kouvo, Antti (2009). Missing Link between Trust and Participation? A country comparison. - In: Civic Mind and Good Citizenship. Comparative Perspectives (ed. Annamari Konttinen), 114-127. Tampere: Tampere University Press.

Kouvo, Antti (2011). Järjestöt sateentekijöinä. Suomalainen järjestöaktiivisuus luottamuksen lähteenä. Teoksessa Hyvien ihmisten maa: auttaminen kilpailukyky-yhteiskunnassa (toim. Pessi, Anne Birgitta & Saari, Juho), 211-228. Helsinki: Diakonia-ammattikorkeakoulu. A Tutkimuksia; 31.

Konttinen, Annamari & Kouvo, Antti (2009). Political Orientations and Active Citizenship in Finland. - In: Civic Mind and Good Citizenship. Comparative Perspectives (ed. Annamari Konttinen), 28-56. Tampere: Tampere University Press.

Konttinen, Annamari (2009). The Idea of Citizenship in a Globalized World. - In: Civic Mind and Good Citizenship. Comparative Perspectives (ed. Annamari Konttinen), 9-27. Tampere: Tampere University Press.

Kankainen, Tomi (2007). Yhdistykset, instituutiot ja luottamus. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän yliopisto. Jyväskylä Studies in Education, Psychology and Social Research; 326.

Kankainen, Tomi (2009). Voluntary associations and trust in Finland. Research on Finnish Society 2 (2009), 5-17 [verkkodokumentti]. http://www.finnresearch.fi/4_kankainen_2009.pdf [viitattu 10.6.2009]

Borg, Sami (2006). Käsitykset kansalaisuudesta ja omista vaikuttamismahdollisuuksista. Teoksessa: Suomen demokratiaindikaattorit (toim. Sami Borg), 115-127. Helsinki: Oikeusministeriö. Oikeusministeriön julkaisu 2006:1.

Blom, Raimo & Konttinen, Annamari (2009). Conclusions: EU as a Political Entity? Citizenship and Participation in EU countries. - In: Civic Mind and Good Citizenship. Comparative Perspectives (ed. Annamari Konttinen), 169-189. Tampere: Tampere University Press.

Blom, Raimo (2009). Divergent Citizenship. In: Civic Mind and Good Citizenship. Comparative Perspectives (ed. Annamari Konttinen), 128-146. Tampere: Tampere University Press.

Dalton Russell J., 2017, The Participation Gap. Social Status and Political Inequality. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Font Joan, Della Porta Donatella and Sintomen Yves (eds.), 2014, Participatory Democracy in Southern Europe. Rowman and Littlefield, London.

Wauters, Bram. 2018. Which party members participate in direct political action? A cross-national analysis. International Political Science Review 39(2): 225-41.

Nicolas Somma; Matias Bargsted 2018. Political inequality in 38 countries: A distributional approach. Comparative Sociology 17(5): 26.

Katalin Füzér, Ákos Huszár, Ákos Bodor, Lajos Bálint & Attila Pirmajer (2020) Social capitals, social class, and prosperity in high-trust and low-trust societies, International Journal of Sociology, 50:1, 48-67, DOI: 10.1080/00207659.2019.1684081

Choi, G. 2019. Revisiting the redistribution hypothesis with perceived inequality and redistributive preferences. European Journal of Political Economy.

Witschge, Jacqueline, and Herman G. Van De Werfhorst. 2019. Curricular tracking and civic and political engagement: Comparing adolescents and young adults across education systems. Acta Sociologica 63:3, 284-302. doi: 10.1177/0001699318818650.

Tyrowicz, Joanna, and Magdalena Smyk. 2019. Wage Inequality and Structural Change. Social Indicators Research 141(2): 503-538.

Ruderman, Nicholas Maxwell, 2017. Political-Financial Scandal, Political Disaffection, and the Dynamics of Political Action. (PhD), Political Science, University of Toronto.

Goubin, Silke (2020). Economic inequality, perceived responsiveness and political trust. Acta Polit 55, 267-304. DOI: 10.1057/s41269-018-0115-z

Mayne, Quinton and Geisel, Brigitte 2018. Don't Good Democracies Need 'Good' Citizens? Citizen Dispositions and the Study of Democratic Quality. Politics and Governance 6(1): 14.

Dixon, Jeffrey C., Destinee B. Mccollum, and Andrew S. Fullerton. 2018. Who Is a Part-Time Worker Around the World and Why Does It Matter? Examining the Quality of Employment Measures and Workers' Perceived Job Quality. Sociological Spectrum 38(1): 1-23.

Kolczynska, Marta (2019): Micro- and Macro-level Determinants of Participation in Demonstrations: An Analysis of Crossnational Survey Data Harmonized Ex-post. In: methods, data, analyses: 1-36. https://doi.org/10.12758/mda.2019.07.

Biolcati, Ferruccio; Molteni, Francesco; Quandt, Markus & Vezzoni, Cristiano (2020): Church Attendance and Religious change Pooled European dataset (CARPE): a survey harmonization project for the comparative analysis of long-term trends in individual religiosity. Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, 1-25. DOI: 10.1007/s11135-020-01048-9.

Engler, Sarah and Weisstanner, David. 2021.The threat of social decline: income inequality and radical right support. Journal of European Public Policy 28:2, 153-173. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2020.1733636.

Sadowski, I. 2009. The Contextuality of the Concept of Civil Society-from Particular Meanings to the Common Vector of Emancipation. Polish Sociological Review (165):63-80.

Dalton, Russell J. 2021. Political Action, Protest, and the Functioning of Democratic Governance. American Behavioral Scientist Online first:1-18. doi: 10.1177/00027642211021624

Valgarosson, Viktor Orri & Devine, Daniel (2021): What satisfaction with democracy? A global analysis of "satisfaction with democracy" measures. In: Political Research Quarterly: 1-25. doi: 10.1177/10659129211009605.

Biolcati, Ferruccio; Molteni, Francesco; Quandt, Markus and Vezzoni, Cristiano (2022): "Church Attendance and Religious change Pooled European dataset (CARPE): a survey harmonization project for the comparative analysis of long-term trends in individual religiosity." In: Quality and Quantity 56 (3): 1729-1753. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135020-01048-9.

Dalton, Russell J. (2022): "Political Action, Protest, and the Functioning of Democratic Governance: PROD." In: The American Behavioral Scientist 66 (4): 533-50. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642211021624

Rybak, Adam (2023) Survey Mode and Nonresponse Bias: A Meta-Analysis Based on the Data from the International Social Survey Programme Waves 1996-2018 and the European Social Survey Rounds 1 to 9. PloS one 18(3). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283092.

Kołczyńska, Marta; Jabkowski, Piotr and Eckman, Stephanie (2023) Interviewer Involvement in Respondent Selection Moderates the Relationship between Response Rates and Sample Bias in Cross-National Survey Projects in Europe. In: Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smad013

Jennifer Oser, Fernando Feitosa, Ruth Dassonneville. (2023) Who Feels They Can Understand and Have an Impact on Political Processes? Socio-Demographic Correlates of Political Efficacy in 46 Countries, 1996-2016. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 35(2). https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edad013.