FSD2752 Finnish Working Life Barometer: Local Government Employees 2007

Aineisto on käytettävissä (B) tutkimukseen, opetukseen ja opiskeluun.

Lataa aineisto täältä

Muunkieliset kuvailuversiot

Aineistoon liittyvät tiedostot

Aineiston nimi

Finnish Working Life Barometer: Local Government Employees 2007

Aineistonumero

FSD2752

Pysyvät tunnisteet

https://urn.fi/urn:nbn:fi:fsd:T-FSD2752
https://doi.org/10.60686/t-fsd2752

Aineiston laatu

Kvantitatiivinen aineisto

Tekijät

  • Statistics Finland. Interview and Survey Services
  • Ministry of Labour

Muut tekijät

  • Centre for Occupational Safety

Sisällön kuvaus

The annual survey studied employee opinion on the quality of working life in Finnish municipalities. Main themes were psychosocial working environment, job characteristics, pay systems, job satisfaction, employment security, training and development, capacity to work, and bullying and discrimination at work.

First, the respondents were asked how many years they had worked for the employer they were working for at the time, type of contract, number of persons at the workplace, what kind of changes there had been in staff numbers, working hours, and contracts over the past 12 months, and whether people had been transferred to other units. Further questions covered team work, and whether there had been conflicts at the workplace, between what groups and whether the conflicts had decreased or increased over the past 12 months. Incidents of bullying and violence were charted.

Next set of questions covered the respondent's autonomy at work and other job characteristics, overtime and its compensation, flexible working time arrangements, and R's membership in a trade union or professional association. Changes over the past year in workload, physical or mental stress, in access to training etc were explored as well as pay and bonus systems, and satisfaction with pay. Psychosocial working environment was charted with a number of questions, for instance, whether employees were treated equally, how supervisors handled development ideas suggested by subordinates and so on. One topic pertained to whether the respondents had presented any ideas to improve working conditions, products, services or working methods at the workplace and whether there had been other development initiatives. The respondents' participation in job-related training and development was investigated.

One theme pertained to job satisfaction. The respondents were asked to what extent they agreed with a number of statements relating to staff sufficiency, organisation of work, access to information, physical or mental stress etc. They were asked how likely it was that they would be dismissed or laid off, or their tasks or working hours would be changed over the next year. Opinions on the employment situation in Finland and on changes happening in working life were charted. A number of questions investigated how the employees' capacity to work and occupational safety had been taken into account at the workplace, the respondents' sickness absences, and estimate of own mental and physical capacity to work. Discrimination at work based on ethnic group, age, gender and type of contract was explored. Finally, the respondents were asked whether they had done their main work from home or somewhere else outside of workplace (telework).

Background variables included the respondent's gender, age, major region (NUTS2), type of municipality, education, occupational status, industry of employment, employer type, status in employment, economic activity, weekly working hours, additional jobs, whether R worked for a municipality or a federation of municipalities and in which sector. Information on age, gender, major region, type of municipality and education level were obtained from registers. Other background variables were obtained from the Labour Force Survey 2007 telephone interviews which were often conducted together with the Finnish Working Life Barometer interview.

Asiasanat

arrangement of working time; autonomy at work; discrimination; employees; employment contracts; job characteristics; job satisfaction; job security; local government officers; occupational training; personnel management; personnel policy; telework; wages; working conditions

Tieteenala/Aihealue

Sarja

Finnish Working Life Barometers: Local Government Employees

Jakelija

Finnish Social Science Data Archive

Käyttöoikeudet

The dataset is (B) available for research, teaching and study.

Kerääjät

  • Statistics Finland

Tuottajat

  • Centre for Occupational Safety. Local Government Sector Group

Ajallinen kattavuus

2007

Aineistonkeruun ajankohta

2007-09-03 – 2007-10-11

Maa

Finland

Kohdealue

Finland

Havaintoyksikkötyyppi

Individual

Perusjoukko/otos

Finnish-speaking local government employees, aged 18 - 64, who worked at least 10 hours a week

Tutkimuksen aikaulottuvuus

Longitudinal: Trend/Repeated cross-section

Lähdeaineistot

Official Statistics of Finland (OSF): Labour force survey 2007 [e-publication]. ISSN=1798-7857. Helsinki: Statistics Finland. Access method: http://www.stat.fi/til/tyti/tie_en.html [referred: 18 July 2012].

Ministry of Labour & Statistics Finland: Finnish Working Life Barometer 2007.

Otantamenetelmä

Probability: Simple random

Simple random sample from the population register. For its Labour Force Survey 2007, Statistics Finland drew a random sample of people aged between 15 - 74 and living in Finland. From the Labour Force Survey sample, Finnish-speaking employees aged 18 - 64 who had responded being employed for at least 10 hours a week were selected for the Working Life Barometer. This dataset contains the interview data of local government employees only (N=672). The target population was deliberately oversampled.

Keruumenetelmä

Telephone interview: Computer-assisted (CATI)

Keruuväline tai –ohje

Structured questionnaire

Datatiedostojen kieli

Aineistopaketti voi sisältää samoja tiedostoja eri kielisinä.

Aineisto sisältää datatiedostoja seuraavilla kielillä: suomi.

Tietoarkisto kääntää kvantitatiivisia datatiedostoja englanniksi. Lisätietoja käännöspyynnön jättämisestä.

Datan versio

2.0

Katso myös

FSD2646 Finnish Working Life Barometer 2007

Painokertoimet

There are no weight variables in the data.

Viittausvaatimus

The data and its creators shall be cited in all publications and presentations for which the data have been used. The bibliographic citation may be in the form suggested by the archive or in the form required by the publication.

Malliviittaus

Statistics Finland & Ministry of Labour: Finnish Working Life Barometer: Local Government Employees 2007 [dataset]. Version 2.0 (2018-07-26). Finnish Social Science Data Archive [distributor]. https://urn.fi/urn:nbn:fi:fsd:T-FSD2752

Julkaisusta tiedottaminen

Notify FSD of all publications where you have used the data by sending the citation information to user-services.fsd@tuni.fi.

Erityisehdot

Users of the data shall send a copy of all research publications based on or using the data to the following two mail addresses: Tiina-Mari Monni, Työturvallisuuskeskus, Lönnrotinkatu 4 B, 00120 Helsinki, Finland; and Antti Siikanen, Haastattelu- ja tutkimuspalvelut, 00022 Tilastokeskus, Finland.

Varaumat

The original data creators and the archive bear no responsibility for any results or interpretations arising from the reuse of the data.

Julkaisut aineistosta Tooltip

Ylöstalo, Pekka & Jukka, Pirkko (2008). Työolobarometri. Lokakuu 2007. Helsinki: Työ- ja elinkeinoministeriö. Työ- ja elinkeinoministeriön julkaisuja; Työ ja yrittäjyys 16/2008.

Kunta-alan työolobarometri 2007. Työ- ja elinkeinoministeriön tyolobarometrin 2007 kuntatyöpaikkojen osatarkastelu (2008) [verkkodokumentti]. Helsinki: Työturvallisuuskeskus, kuntaryhmä. Saatavilla: http://www.ttk.fi/files/95/Kuntabaro2007.pdf [Viitattu 13.7.2012] .

Aineiston kuvailu koneluettavassa DDI-C 2.5 -formaatissa

Creative Commons License
Aineiston kuvailu on lisensoitu Creative Commons Nimeä 4.0 Kansainvälinen -lisenssin mukaisesti.