FSD2756 Finnish Working Life Barometer: Local Government Employees 2011
Aineisto on käytettävissä (B) tutkimukseen, opetukseen ja opiskeluun.
Lataa aineisto täältä
Muunkieliset kuvailuversiot
Aineistoon liittyvät tiedostot
Aineiston nimi
Finnish Working Life Barometer: Local Government Employees 2011
Aineistonumero
FSD2756
Pysyvät tunnisteet
https://urn.fi/urn:nbn:fi:fsd:T-FSD2756https://doi.org/10.60686/t-fsd2756
Aineiston laatu
Kvantitatiivinen aineisto
Tekijät
- Statistics Finland. Interview and Survey Services
- Ministry of Employment and the Economy
Muut tekijät
- Centre for Occupational Safety
Sisällön kuvaus
The annual survey studied employee opinion on the quality of working life in Finnish municipalities. Main themes were psychosocial working environment, job characteristics, pay and working time arrangements, satisfaction with the job, employment security, training and development, capacity to work, telework, and bullying and discrimination at work.
First, the respondents were asked how many years they had worked for the employer they were working for at the time, type of contract, number of persons at the workplace, and what kind of changes there had been in staff numbers and type of contracts during the past 12 months. Further questions charted whether people had been transferred from other units and whether the employer had used temporary agency employees. Questions also covered team work, whether there had been conflicts at the workplace and between what groups. Incidents of bullying, harassment and violence were charted.
Next set of questions investigated the respondent's autonomy and influence at work and other job characteristics, overtime and its compensation, flexible working time arrangements, local bargaining on working time, and R's membership in a trade union or professional association. Changes over the past year in workload and pace of work, safety at work etc were explored as well as pay and bonus systems, pay bargaining and satisfaction with pay. Psychosocial working environment was charted with a number of questions, for instance, whether there was support for trying new things and so on. One topic pertained to whether the respondents had presented any ideas to improve working conditions, products, services or working methods at the workplace and whether there had been other development initiatives. The respondents' participation in job-related training and development was investigated.
One theme pertained to job satisfaction. The respondents were asked to what extent they agreed with a number of statements relating to staff sufficiency, organisation of work, access to information, physical or mental stress etc. They were asked how likely it was that they would be dismissed or laid off, or their tasks would be changed over the next year. Views were probed on the employer's economic situation, employment situation in Finland and possible changes in working life. A number of questions investigated how the employees' capacity to work and occupational health and safety had been taken into account at the workplace, the respondents' sickness absences, illnesses and disabilities, and estimate of own mental and physical capacity to work. The respondents were asked about working from home (telework), doing work somewhere else outside of workplace and being in contact with clients or workplace outside of normal working hours. Discrimination at work based on ethnic group, age, gender and type of contract was explored as well as whether the respondents had colleagues of other nationality or ethnic origin.
Background variables included the respondent's year of birth, age, gender, region, type of municipality, education level, economic activity, status in employment, industry of employment, employer type, weekly working hours, and additional jobs. Information on age, gender, region, type of municipality and education level were obtained from registers. The other background variables were obtained from the Labour Force Survey 2011 telephone interviews which were often conducted together with the Finnish Working Life Barometer interview.
Asiasanat
arrangement of working time; autonomy at work; discrimination; economic recession; employees; employment contracts; job characteristics; job satisfaction; job security; local bargaining; local government officers; occupational safety; occupational training; personnel management; personnel policy; wages; working conditions; workloads
Tieteenala/Aihealue
- Social sciences (OKM:n tieteenalaluokitus)
- Social behaviour and attitudes (CESSDAn aihepiiriluokitus)
- Equality, inequality and social exclusion (CESSDAn aihepiiriluokitus)
- Employment (CESSDAn aihepiiriluokitus)
- Labour relations/conflict (CESSDAn aihepiiriluokitus)
- Working conditions (CESSDAn aihepiiriluokitus)
- Occupational health (CESSDAn aihepiiriluokitus)
Sarja
Finnish Working Life Barometers: Local Government EmployeesJakelija
Finnish Social Science Data Archive
Käyttöoikeudet
The dataset is (B) available for research, teaching and study.
Kerääjät
- Statistics Finland
Tuottajat
- Centre for Occupational Safety. Local Government Sector Group
Ajallinen kattavuus
2011
Aineistonkeruun ajankohta
2011-09-05 – 2011-10-13
Maa
Finland
Kohdealue
Finland
Havaintoyksikkötyyppi
Individual
Perusjoukko/otos
Finnish-speaking local government employees, aged 18 - 64, who worked at least 10 hours a week
Tutkimuksen aikaulottuvuus
Longitudinal: Trend/Repeated cross-section
Lähdeaineistot
Official Statistics of Finland (OSF): Labour force survey 2011 [e-publication]. ISSN=1798-7857. Helsinki: Statistics Finland. Access method: http://www.stat.fi/til/tyti/tie_en.html [referred: 21 September 2012].
Ministry of Employment and the Economy & Statistics Finland: Finnish Working Life Barometer 2011.
Otantamenetelmä
Probability: Simple random
Simple random sample from the population register. For its Labour Force Survey 2011, Statistics Finland drew a random sample of people aged between 15 - 74 and living in Finland. From the Labour Force Survey sample, people aged 18 - 64 who had responded being employed for at least 10 hours a week were selected for the Working Life Barometer which covered all Finnish-speaking employees. This dataset contains the interview data of local government employees only (N=658). The target population was deliberately oversampled.
Keruumenetelmä
Telephone interview: Computer-assisted (CATI)
Keruuväline tai –ohje
Structured questionnaire
Vastausprosentti
81
Datatiedostojen kieli
Aineistopaketti voi sisältää samoja tiedostoja eri kielisinä.
Aineisto sisältää datatiedostoja seuraavilla kielillä: suomi.
Tietoarkisto kääntää kvantitatiivisia datatiedostoja englanniksi. Lisätietoja käännöspyynnön jättämisestä.
Datan versio
3.0
Katso myös
FSD2824 Finnish Working Life Barometer 2011
Painokertoimet
There are no weight variables in the data.
Viittausvaatimus
The data and its creators shall be cited in all publications and presentations for which the data have been used. The bibliographic citation may be in the form suggested by the archive or in the form required by the publication.
Malliviittaus
Statistics Finland & Ministry of Employment and the Economy: Finnish Working Life Barometer: Local Government Employees 2011 [dataset]. Version 3.0 (2018-07-20). Finnish Social Science Data Archive [distributor]. https://urn.fi/urn:nbn:fi:fsd:T-FSD2756
Julkaisusta tiedottaminen
Notify FSD of all publications where you have used the data by sending the citation information to user-services.fsd@tuni.fi.
Erityisehdot
Users of the data shall send a copy of all research publications based on or using the data to the following two mail addresses: Tiina-Mari Monni, Työturvallisuuskeskus, Lönnrotinkatu 4 B, 00120 Helsinki, Finland; and Antti Siikanen, Haastattelu- ja tutkimuspalvelut, 00022 Tilastokeskus, Finland.
Varaumat
The original data creators and the archive bear no responsibility for any results or interpretations arising from the reuse of the data.
Julkaisut aineistosta
Kunta-alan työolobarometri 2011. Työ- ja elinkeinoministeriön työolobarometrin 2011 kuntatyöpaikkojen osatarkastelu (2012) [verkkodokumentti]. Helsinki: Työturvallisuuskeskus, kuntaryhmä. Saatavilla: http://www.ttk.fi/files/2500/Kunta-alan_tyoolobarometri_2011.pdf [viitattu 13.7.2012].
Aho, Simo & Mäkiaho, Ari (2012). Työolobarometri. Lokakuu 2011. Helsinki: Työ- ja elinkeinoministeriö. Työ- ja elinkeinoministeriön julkaisuja; Työ ja yrittäjyys 29/2012. http://www.tem.fi/files/33535/TEMjul_29_2012_web.pdf.pdf [viitattu 2.8.2012].
Aineiston kuvailu koneluettavassa DDI-C 2.5 -formaatissa
Aineiston kuvailu on lisensoitu Creative Commons Nimeä 4.0 Kansainvälinen -lisenssin mukaisesti.