FSD3000 Police Barometer 2014
Aineisto on käytettävissä (B) tutkimukseen, opetukseen ja opiskeluun.
Lataa aineisto täältä
Muunkieliset kuvailuversiot
Aineistoon liittyvät tiedostot
Aineiston nimi
Police Barometer 2014
Aineistonumero
FSD3000
Pysyvät tunnisteet
https://urn.fi/urn:nbn:fi:fsd:T-FSD3000https://doi.org/10.60686/t-fsd3000
Aineiston laatu
Kvantitatiivinen aineisto
Tekijät
- Ministry of the Interior. Police Department
Sisällön kuvaus
The survey studied Finnish public opinion on the role and services of the police, feelings about safety and security, fear of crime, experiences of crime, and trust in the national institutions in crime prevention.
First, the respondents were asked how important certain bodies (e.g. the Church, the Customs, schools, the Defence Forces) were to crime prevention and to improving the safety of their neighbourhood. Opinions on the extent to which the police force can prevent civil disorder and maintain safety were charted as well as whether the respondents had experiences of international crime.
The respondents were asked how important certain things were in terms of maintaining public order and safety by the police, for instance, that the employment situation would improve, people suffering from substance abuse would receive treatment, prostitution would be prohibited and that the police would adopt zero-tolerance towards law-breaking. Views were probed on which tasks of the police were important. One question examined opinions on the ways of improving road safety.
Sense of security and fear of crime were studied by asking how worried the respondents were about certain things (e.g. assaults, house break-in, drink driving, sexual harassment, Internet data security). Some questions focused on how safe the respondents felt at home during the day, in the city centre after dark, in their neighbourhood late at night, etc. Views were charted on how serious a problem crime was in the neighbourhood. The respondents were asked whether they themselves had become victims of certain crimes, whether they had notified the police, and if not, why. Further questions surveyed whether the respondents had been eyewitnesses to any crimes (e.g. theft, assault) or witnesses/complainants in a criminal procedure, and whether they had experienced a threat or pressure from somebody subjected to a criminal procedure. Measures taken by the respondents to reduce the risk of crime (e.g. use of burglar alarms or avoidance of city centre after dark) were charted.
Opinions on the accessibility and visibility of the police were examined by asking what the distance was from their home to the nearest police station, and whether the respondents had used the online services of the police. The quality of police services were assessed with questions about the last time the respondents had contacted the police, reasons for doing so, and how they had been treated. The respondents also rated how well the police had succeeded in solving crimes, preventing crime, providing help quickly, etc.
Opinions on the attitude of the police towards people from different ethnic backgrounds were studied. The survey also charted opinions on the development of the services provided by the police as well as trust in various institutions, such as the police, emergency and protective services, private security guards, the Border Guard, the Customs, and the Defence Forces. Opinions on the likelihood of police corruption were surveyed. In conclusion, the respondents were asked how long they had lived in their municipality of residence, how often they travelled abroad, and how often they spent time in the population centre of their municipality in the evening or at night.
Background variables included the respondent's gender, age group, economic activity and occupational status, level of education, mother tongue, Internet use, household composition, ages of children living in the household, number of persons living in the household, gross annual household income, type of neighbourhood, and municipality and region (NUTS3) of residence.
Asiasanat
crime and security; crime victims; fear of crime; law enforcement; offences; personal safety; police corruption; police services; police-community relationship; policing; road safety; trust; witnesses
Tieteenala/Aihealue
- Social sciences (OKM:n tieteenalaluokitus)
- Crime and law enforcement (CESSDAn aihepiiriluokitus)
Sarja
Police BarometersJakelija
Finnish Social Science Data Archive
Käyttöoikeudet
The dataset is (B) available for research, teaching and study.
Kerääjät
- ISS-otantatutkimus
Tuottajat
- Ministry of the Interior. Police Department
Ajallinen kattavuus
2014
Aineistonkeruun ajankohta
2014-09-08 – 2014-11-09
Maa
Finland
Kohdealue
Finland
Havaintoyksikkötyyppi
Individual
Perusjoukko/otos
People aged 15-79 living in Finland (poislukien the Åland Islands, as well as policemen/women, their families, and their close relatives)
Tutkimuksen aikaulottuvuus
Longitudinal: Trend/Repeated cross-section
Otantamenetelmä
Non-probability: Quota
Quota sampling based on the age, gender, region, and municipality size distributions of the target population. 1,015 persons were interviewed.
The ranges of municipality size used were: A town/municipality with under 30,000 inhabitants, a town/municipality with 30,000 - 100,000 inhabitants and a town/municipality with over 100,000 inhabitants. Interviews were conducted in 78 municipalities.
Keruumenetelmä
Face-to-face interview
Keruuväline tai –ohje
Structured questionnaire
Datatiedostojen kieli
Aineistopaketti voi sisältää samoja tiedostoja eri kielisinä.
Aineisto sisältää datatiedostoja seuraavilla kielillä: englanti ja suomi.
Tietoarkisto kääntää kvantitatiivisia datatiedostoja englanniksi. Lisätietoja käännöspyynnön jättämisestä.
Havaintojen ja muuttujien lukumäärä
326 muuttujaa ja 1015 havaintoa.
Datan versio
2.0
Aineiston käytössä huomioitavaa
To prevent identification, background variables bv3 and bv4 charting municipality of residence were removed during archiving.
Painokertoimet
The data include a weight variable (PAINO) that weights the sample to correspond to the target population in terms of age, gender, region and municipality size.
Viittausvaatimus
The data and its creators shall be cited in all publications and presentations for which the data have been used. The bibliographic citation may be in the form suggested by the archive or in the form required by the publication.
Malliviittaus
Ministry of the Interior: Police Barometer 2014 [dataset]. Version 2.0 (2018-08-10). Finnish Social Science Data Archive [distributor]. https://urn.fi/urn:nbn:fi:fsd:T-FSD3000
Julkaisusta tiedottaminen
Notify FSD of all publications where you have used the data by sending the citation information to user-services.fsd@tuni.fi.
Varaumat
The original data creators and the archive bear no responsibility for any results or interpretations arising from the reuse of the data.
Julkaisut aineistosta
Hannonen, Raimo & Käyhkö, Esa: Poliisibarometri 2014. Kansalaisten käsitykset poliisin toiminnasta ja sisäisen turvallisuuden tilasta (2015) Sisäministeriön julkaisuja 4/2015. Helsinki: Sisäministeriö. Saatavilla http://www.intermin.fi/julkaisu/042015?docID=58278 [viitattu 20.2.2015]
Vuorensyrjä, Matti & Fagerlund, Monica (2016). Poliisibarometri 2016. Kansalaisten käsitykset poliisin toiminnasta ja sisäisen turvallisuuden tilasta [verkkodokumentti]. Helsinki: Sisäministeriö. Sisäinen turvallisuus. Sisäministeriön julkaisu 27/2016. http://www.intermin.fi/julkaisu/272016 [viitattu 10.10.2016]
Vuorensyrjä, Matti (2016). Poliisi kansalaisten silmin: näkemykset operatiivisissa tehtävissä onnistumisesta ja luottamus poliisiin. Teoksessa Muttilainen, Vesa & Potila, Pauliina (toim.), Poliisin toimintaympäristö (ss. 172-179). Poliisiammattikorkeakoulun raportteja 125. Poliisiammattikorkeakoulu, Tampere.
Vuorensyrjä, Matti & Fagerlund, Monica (2018). Poliisibarometri 2018. Kansalaisten arviot poliisin toiminnasta ja Suomen sisäisen turvallisuuden tilasta. Raportteja 130. Poliisiammattikorkeakoulu, Tampere. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-815-344-6.
Van der Giessen, Mark & Bayerl, Petra Saskia & Jacobs, Gabriele. (2016). Unity - Report on the Baseline Measurements. H2020-Project Unity Deliverable 7.3. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Centre of Excellence in Public Safety Management/Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam.
Sipponen, Samuli (2018) "Ei niitä kuitenkaan täällä näy" Koettu turvallisuus Suomen maaseudulla 2012-2016 ja poliisin säästötoimenpiteet. Kandidaatintutkielma. Jyväskylän yliopisto
Aineiston kuvailu koneluettavassa DDI-C 2.5 -formaatissa
Aineiston kuvailu on lisensoitu Creative Commons Nimeä 4.0 Kansainvälinen -lisenssin mukaisesti.