FSD3692 Satakunta 2050 -kansalaiskeskustelu 2020

[post_v9] Imagine that the Regional Council of Satakunta is pondering over three alternatives, that all are developed to prevent severe damages caused by floods in the region. Which alternative would you choose?

Aineistosta ei ole saatavilla muuttujatietoja valitulla kuvailukielellä.

Kysymysteksti

Imagine that the Regional Council of Satakunta is pondering over three alternatives, that all are developed to prevent severe damages caused by floods in the region. Floods can cause damage to health, safety, environment, transportation, energy supply, economy and cultural heritage, if one doesn't prepare for them. The cost for the current tax payers of each alternative are the same. Which alternative would you choose?

Frekvenssit

selite/vastausvaihtoehto	arvo	n
Alternative A prevents 20 destructive floods during this generation, and 10 during the next generation	1	19
Alternative B prevents no destructive floods during this generation, but 30 during the next generation	2	8
Alternative C prevents 10 destructive floods during this generation, and 20 during the next generation	3	27
	SYSMISS	995
Esitetyt jakaumat ovat painottamattomia

Tunnusluvut

kelvollisten havaintojen lkm	54
maksimi	3
minimi	1
keskiarvo	2.15
keskihajonta	.920