FSD3784 Finnish Working Life Barometer 2022

The dataset is (B) available for research, teaching and study.

Download the data

Study description in other languages

Related files

Study title

Finnish Working Life Barometer 2022

Dataset ID Number

FSD3784

Persistent identifier

urn:nbn:fi:fsd:T-FSD3784

Data Type

Quantitative

Authors

  • Statistics Finland. Interview and Survey Services
  • Ministry of Economic Affairs and Employment

Abstract

The annual survey studied employee opinion on the quality of working life in Finland. Main themes included organisation of work, development opportunities and flexibility, learning and training at work, wages, workplace bullying, capacity to work, and changes in working life. Questions in the barometer have mainly remained the same each year. The questionnaire, target population and collection method of the survey were changed for the 2021 collection round.

First, the respondents were asked about the number of people employed at their workplace and changes in the number of staff in the past 12 months. Satisfaction in the working environment was charted with questions about openness, encouragement, trust and equality in the workplace. Further questions covered measures taken to improve employees' capacity to work and safety of work environment. The respondents were asked whether their place of work supported its employees in learning and trying new things, and whether they had taken part in job-related training in the past 12 months and received a salary during that time. Participation in job-related training through different methods (e.g. online, with a mentor, self-study) in the past 12 months was surveyed. The respondents were also asked whether in the past 12 months they had developed their skills and competence so that they could work in a new role in the future, and whether they had received new tasks or responsibilities at their job that had required them to learn new things.

The next set of questions focused on flexible working time arrangements at the workplace, pay and bonus systems, satisfaction with the pay level, and digital tools as part of work. Autonomy at work was surveyed by asking about influence over own work tasks and working pace, over the distribution of work in the workplace, and about working to a tight schedule. Remote work was investigated with questions on whether the respondents had worked remotely in the past 12 months and whether they felt they could influence how much remote work they did. The respondents' experiences of working with their manages were examined with questions on, for example, whether they receive feedback from their manager when they succeeded in their work, whether their managed treats employees fairly and equally, and whether their manager is interested in their workplace wellbeing. The use of digital tools, virtual workspaces, and social media services as part of work tasks was also charted.

One set of questions investigated the employees' perceived workload, capacity to work, estimates of own mental and physical capacity to work, and sickness absences. Discrimination at work based on factors such as ethnic group, age, gender, sexual orientation, and health status was explored. Incidents of bullying, sexual harassment and violence at work were also surveyed. Additionally, the respondents' experiences of stress, mental exhaustion, inability to focus, togetherness and excitement related to work were surveyed. The respondents were asked how likely they thought it was that they would be temporarily laid off or made redundant. Views were probed on the respondents' likelihood of getting an equal job if they became unemployed and what they would do if they became unemployed (e.g. apply for a new job in the same field, apply for a new job in a different field, become self-employed, get a job abroad). Finally, the respondents' membership of trade unions and unemployment funds was surveyed.

Background variables included, among others, the respondent's year of birth, age, gender, status in employment, employer type, industry of employment, type of contract, and weekly working hours.

Keywords

career development; employees; employment; employment opportunities; expectation; flexible working time; hours of work; job satisfaction; occupational life; telework; wages; working conditions; workloads; workplace bullying

Topic Classification

Series

Finnish Working Life Barometers

Distributor

Finnish Social Science Data Archive

Access

The dataset is (B) available for research, teaching and study.

Data Collector

  • Statistics Finland

Funders

  • Ministry of Economic Affairs and Employment

Time Period Covered

2022

Collection Dates

2022-08-08 – 2022-10-13

Nation

Finland

Geographical Coverage

Finland

Analysis/Observation Unit Type

Individual

Universe

Employees aged 18-64 whose regular working hours are at least 10 hours

Time Method

Longitudinal: Trend/Repeated cross-section

Sampling Procedure

Probability: Stratified

The sample of the survey consisted of employees aged 18-64 who had responded to Statistics Finland's Labour Force Survey. Approximate 2,500 employees were selected for the sample. Respondents to the Labour Force Survey are employees who work at least ten hours per week. The Labour Force Survey sample was selected by stratified random sampling from Statistics Finland's population database which is based on the Central Population Register. The Labour Force Survey is a panel survey in which the same person is interviewed a total of five times over a period of 15 months. The sample for one survey month consists of five rotation groups that have entered the survey at different times.

Collection Mode

Telephone interview: Computer-assisted (CATI)

Self-administered questionnaire: Web-based (CAWI)

Research Instrument

Structured questionnaire

Response Rate

72.2

Data File Language

Downloaded data package may contain different language versions of the same files.

The data files of this dataset are available in the following languages: Finnish.

FSD translates quantitative data into English on request, free of charge. More information on ordering data translation.

Data Version

1.0

Completeness of Data and Restrictions

Due to methodological changes to the Finnish Working Life Barometer, the data from 2021 and 2022 are not directly comparable with the barometers from previous years. Comparability is affected by changes in the data collection method (web-based questionnaire and telephone interviews) and in the structure and content of the questionnaire. In addition, the target population is broader than before, as the barometer can now be answered in Swedish or English in addition to Finnish. The data from 2021 and 2022 are comparable with each other.

The data delivered to FSD do not include background information collected from registers: level of education and region/area of residence.

Weighting

The data contain a weight variable [tb_paino] which weights the data to correspond to target population distributions of gender, 10-year age groups, NUTS2 major regions, level of education, language, socioeconomic status, and wage decile from the Incomes Register to match the target population (employees working at least 10 hours per week) estimated based on the Labour Force Survey sample. A similar weighting coefficient was also used in the 2021 Finnish Working Life Barometer.

Citation Requirement

The data and its creators shall be cited in all publications and presentations for which the data have been used. The bibliographic citation may be in the form suggested by the archive or in the form required by the publication.

Bibliographical Citation

Statistics Finland & Ministry of Economic Affairs and Employment: Finnish Working Life Barometer 2022 [dataset]. Version 1.0 (2023-10-04). Finnish Social Science Data Archive [distributor]. https://urn.fi/urn:nbn:fi:fsd:T-FSD3784

Deposit Requirement

Notify FSD of all publications where you have used the data by sending the citation information to user-services.fsd@tuni.fi.

Disclaimer

The original data creators and the archive bear no responsibility for any results or interpretations arising from the reuse of the data.

Related Publications Tooltip

Lyly-Yrjänäinen, Maija (2023). Työolobarometri 2022. Työ- ja elinkeinoministeriön julkaisuja 2023:13.

Hanhineva, Nelli (2023) Työn laatu työn imun selittäjänä suomalaisilla palkansaajilla. Yhteiskuntatieteiden kandidaatin tutkielma. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän yliopisto. http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:jyu-202403112322

Tulokas, H., & Ollila, R. (2024). Työssä opiskelun ja oppimiskulttuurin yhteys työhyvinvoinnin kokemiseen. Aikuiskasvatustieteen pro gradu -tutkielma. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän yliopisto. http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:jyu-202402061756.

Study description in machine readable DDI-C 2.5 format

Creative Commons License
Metadata record is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.