FSD2737 Classification of Local Government Functions and Use of Records Management Plans in Finnish Municipalities 2011
Aineisto on käytettävissä (B) tutkimukseen, opetukseen ja opiskeluun.
Lataa aineisto täältä
Muunkieliset kuvailuversiot
Aineistoon liittyvät tiedostot
Aineiston nimi
Classification of Local Government Functions and Use of Records Management Plans in Finnish Municipalities 2011
Aineistonumero
FSD2737
Pysyvät tunnisteet
https://urn.fi/urn:nbn:fi:fsd:T-FSD2737https://doi.org/10.60686/t-fsd2737
Aineiston laatu
Kvantitatiivinen aineisto
Tekijät
- Heikkilä, Anssi (University of Jyväskylä. Department of History and Ethnology)
Sisällön kuvaus
The survey charted how the classification of local government functions as well as the records management plans (digital archiving plans for records, eAMS) had been implemented in Finnish municipalities and federations of municipalities.
The first set of questions covered whether the municipality/federation of municipalities used a records management system, who was the provider of the system, whether there was a records management plan in use, when the plan had been first introduced and how the records were classified. Next questions focused on the classification of local government functions. The respondents were asked whether the classification was in use, when it had been introduced, on which levels it was in use (main tasks level, lower levels etc.) and, if the classification was not in use, when the municipality/federation of municipalities was going to introduce it. Further questions included how well the classification functioned and what its advantages and disadvantages were.
The final questions covered the use of the electronic records management plan. The respondents were asked whether the plan was in use, when it had been intoduced, where/how the plan had been implemented, when it was going to be introduced (if not in use already), whether there were plans to get help/support in its use from outside, how well the plan had performed, how useful it was and how well it could be integrated into other systems of the administration.
Background variables included the archives district of the municipality/federation, number of inhabitants in the municipality/federation, number of employees, man-years used for records management and archive, and whether the responding unit was a municipality or federation.
Asiasanat
data; data management; electronic archiving; information processing; local government; records management
Tieteenala/Aihealue
- Social sciences (OKM:n tieteenalaluokitus)
- Natural sciences (OKM:n tieteenalaluokitus)
- Government, political systems and organisations (CESSDAn aihepiiriluokitus)
- Information technology (CESSDAn aihepiiriluokitus)
Sarja
Individual datasetsJakelija
Finnish Social Science Data Archive
Käyttöoikeudet
The dataset is (B) available for research, teaching and study.
Kerääjät
- Heikkilä, Anssi (University of Jyväskylä. Department of History and Ethnology)
Tuottajat
- University of Jyväskylä. Department of History and Ethnology
Ajallinen kattavuus
2011
Aineistonkeruun ajankohta
2011-01-19 – 2011-02-18
Maa
Finland
Kohdealue
Finland
Havaintoyksikkötyyppi
Political-administrative area
Perusjoukko/otos
Municipalities and federations of municipalities of Finland
Tutkimuksen aikaulottuvuus
Cross-section
Otantamenetelmä
Total universe/Complete enumeration
Non-probability: Purposive
Total study in the case of Finnish municipalities. The questionnaire was sent to all 336 municipalities of Finland. In the case of federations of municipalities, the contact details of only 96 out of 184 were available.
Keruumenetelmä
Self-administered questionnaire: Web-based (CAWI)
Keruuväline tai –ohje
Semi-structured questionnaire
Datatiedostojen kieli
Aineistopaketti voi sisältää samoja tiedostoja eri kielisinä.
Aineisto sisältää datatiedostoja seuraavilla kielillä: suomi.
Tietoarkisto kääntää kvantitatiivisia datatiedostoja englanniksi. Lisätietoja käännöspyynnön jättämisestä.
Datan versio
1.0
Aineiston käytössä huomioitavaa
The names of the municipalities/federations of municipalities have been removed from the data and some open-ended questions (available only in Finnish) have been anonymised.
Painokertoimet
There are no weight variables in the data.
Viittausvaatimus
The data and its creators shall be cited in all publications and presentations for which the data have been used. The bibliographic citation may be in the form suggested by the archive or in the form required by the publication.
Malliviittaus
Heikkilä, Anssi (University of Jyväskylä): Classification of Local Government Functions and Use of Records Management Plans in Finnish Municipalities 2011 [dataset]. Data version 1.0 (2012-07-10). Finnish Social Science Data Archive [distributor]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.60686/t-fsd2737; URN: https://urn.fi/urn:nbn:fi:fsd:T-FSD2737
Julkaisusta tiedottaminen
Notify FSD of all publications where you have used the data by sending the citation information to user-services.fsd@tuni.fi.
Varaumat
The original data creators and the archive bear no responsibility for any results or interpretations arising from the reuse of the data.
Julkaisut aineistosta
Heikkilä, Anssi (2012). Kuntaorganisaatioiden näkemykset kuntien yhteisestä tehtäväluokituksesta sekä sähköisestä arkistonmuodostussuunnitelmasta. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän yliopisto. Historian ja etnologian laitos. Arkistonhallinnan pro gradu -tutkielma. http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:jyu-201205241725 [viitattu 11.7.2012].
Aineiston kuvailu koneluettavassa DDI-C 2.5 -formaatissa
Aineiston kuvailu on lisensoitu Creative Commons Nimeä 4.0 Kansainvälinen -lisenssin mukaisesti.