A Climate-Neutral and Resource-Scarce Finland, PIHI (2015-2021); Equality in Society, EQUA (2015-2021); Disruptive Technologies and Changing Institutions, TECH (2015-2021); Changing Society and Active Citizenship, CITIZEN (2017-2021)
EL-TRAN - Transition to a Resource Efficient and Climate Neutral Electricity System; SmartSea - Gulf of Bothnia as Resource for Sustainable Growth; FORBIO - Sustainable, Climate-Neutral and Resource-Efficient Forest-Based Bioeconomy; ScenoProt - Novel Protein Sources for Food Security and Climate; CloseLoop - Closing the Loop for High-Added-Value Materials; CHILDCARE - Finnish Childcare Policies: In/Equality in Focus; WeAll - Social and Economic Sustainability of Future Worklife: Policies, Equalities and Intersectionalities in Finland; TITA - Tackling Inequalities in Time of Austerity; PSE (Oma linja) - My Path; WIP - Work, Inequality and Public Policy; ARTSEQUAL - Arts as Public Service: Strategic Steps towards Equality; COMBAT (PointCloud) - Competence-Based Growth Through Integrated Disruptive Technologies of 3D Digitalization, Robotics, Geospatial Information and Image Processing/Computing - Point Cloud Ecosystem; ROSE - Robots and the Future of Welfare Services; SET (Smart Energy Transition) - Smart Energy Transition - Realizing its Potential for Sustainable Growth for Finland's Second Century; DDI (Digital Disruption of Industry); PVN - Platform Value Now: Value Capturing in the Fast Emerging Platform; BCDC Energia - Cloud Computing as an Enabler of Large Scale Variable Distributed Energy Solutions; BIBU - Tackling Biases and Bubbles in Participation; CORE - Collaborative Remedies for Fragmented Societies; PALO - Participation in Long-Term Decision-Making; N/A
In what kind of organisation did you work during the funding period?
Vastausvaihtoehto
University; University of applied sciences; Government research institute; (Other) public sector organisation; Think tank, interaction/communication agency; (Other) company; Non-governmental organisation; Foreign organisation; Other
Did you know the other partners of your consortium before this SRC programme?
Vastausvaihtoehto
I knew all or most partners before the programme; I knew one or a few of the partners before the programme; I did not know the partners before the programme
Assess the effectiveness of your consortium in advancing the following goals of SRC funding, based on your own experiences and impressions. Advancement of science in an important area
Assess the effectiveness of your consortium in advancing the following goals of SRC funding, based on your own experiences and impressions. Advancement of multi-/interdisciplinary knowledge
Assess the effectiveness of your consortium in advancing the following goals of SRC funding, based on your own experiences and impressions. High-quality research processes and outputs
Assess the effectiveness of your consortium in advancing the following goals of SRC funding, based on your own experiences and impressions. Your personal or your team members' career development
Assess the effectiveness of your consortium in advancing the following goals of SRC funding, based on your own experiences and impressions. Development of solutions to urgent societal problems
Assess the effectiveness of your consortium in advancing the following goals of SRC funding, based on your own experiences and impressions. Partnerships and networking among key actors in Finland
Assess the effectiveness of your consortium in advancing the following goals of SRC funding, based on your own experiences and impressions. (Other) organisational benefits for your site of research
Assess the effectiveness of your consortium in advancing the following goals of SRC funding, based on your own experiences and impressions. Development of methods and practices for knowledge co-creation with societal stakeholders
Assess the added value of the following features of SRC funding, based on your own experiences and impressions of the SRC programme you were part of. Large-scale research consortia with multiple partners involved
Assess the added value of the following features of SRC funding, based on your own experiences and impressions of the SRC programme you were part of. Internally heterogeneous research consortia with different partners involved
Assess the added value of the following features of SRC funding, based on your own experiences and impressions of the SRC programme you were part of. (Relatively) long-term funding for consortia
Assess the added value of the following features of SRC funding, based on your own experiences and impressions of the SRC programme you were part of. 100 % funding share
Assess the added value of the following features of SRC funding, based on your own experiences and impressions of the SRC programme you were part of. Problem-driven, or solution-oriented, focus of research
Assess the added value of the following features of SRC funding, based on your own experiences and impressions of the SRC programme you were part of. Emphasis on societal relevance and impact in (Finnish) society
Assess the added value of the following features of SRC funding, based on your own experiences and impressions of the SRC programme you were part of. Resources for interaction with societal stakeholders
Assess the added value of the following features of SRC funding, based on your own experiences and impressions of the SRC programme you were part of. Coordinated programme activity facilitated by a programme director
Assess the added value of the following features of SRC funding, based on your own experiences and impressions of the SRC programme you were part of. Coordinated activity across SRC programmes
Assess the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration within your consortium. As a consortium partner, how important was the collaboration for the following aspects of your work? Selection of research focus, definition of research problems
Assess the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration within your consortium. As a consortium partner, how important was the collaboration for the following aspects of your work? Understanding and advancing the state of the art
Assess the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration within your consortium. As a consortium partner, how important was the collaboration for the following aspects of your work? Research design, data gathering, methods, tools
Assess the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration within your consortium. As a consortium partner, how important was the collaboration for the following aspects of your work? Application or generalisation of results
Assess the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration within your consortium. As a consortium partner, how important was the collaboration for the following aspects of your work? Dissemination, outreach
Assess the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration within your consortium. As a consortium partner, how important was the collaboration for the following aspects of your work? Supervision, working practices
Did your consortium have research collaboration with other SRC consortia (within or beyond the SRC programme you were part of)? No, or I am not aware of it
Did your consortium have research collaboration with other SRC consortia (within or beyond the SRC programme you were part of)? Yes, within the SRC programme
Did your consortium have research collaboration with other SRC consortia (within or beyond the SRC programme you were part of)? Yes, across the SRC programme borders
Assess the consortium's interactions with societal stakeholders (those you were involved in) using the following statements. The interactions were goal-oriented.
Vastausvaihtoehto
I disagree; I disagree to some extent; I neither agree nor disagree; I agree to some extent; I agree; I don't know
Assess the consortium's interactions with societal stakeholders (those you were involved in) using the following statements. The amount/intensity of interactions was appropriate.
Vastausvaihtoehto
I disagree; I disagree to some extent; I neither agree nor disagree; I agree to some extent; I agree; I don't know
Assess the consortium's interactions with societal stakeholders (those you were involved in) using the following statements. The interactions reached key target groups.
Vastausvaihtoehto
I disagree; I disagree to some extent; I neither agree nor disagree; I agree to some extent; I agree; I don't know
Assess the consortium's interactions with societal stakeholders (those you were involved in) using the following statements. The interactions reached a wide range of target groups.
Vastausvaihtoehto
I disagree; I disagree to some extent; I neither agree nor disagree; I agree to some extent; I agree; I don't know
Assess the consortium's interactions with societal stakeholders (those you were involved in) using the following statements. The interactions took into account the needs of different parties.
Vastausvaihtoehto
I disagree; I disagree to some extent; I neither agree nor disagree; I agree to some extent; I agree; I don't know
Assess the consortium's interactions with societal stakeholders (those you were involved in) using the following statements. It was easy to participate in the interactions.
Vastausvaihtoehto
I disagree; I disagree to some extent; I neither agree nor disagree; I agree to some extent; I agree; I don't know
Assess the consortium's interactions with societal stakeholders (those you were involved in) using the following statements. There were sufficient resources for interactions.
Vastausvaihtoehto
I disagree; I disagree to some extent; I neither agree nor disagree; I agree to some extent; I agree; I don't know
Assess the consortium's interactions with societal stakeholders (those you were involved in) using the following statements. The interactions were fruitful/relevant.
Vastausvaihtoehto
I disagree; I disagree to some extent; I neither agree nor disagree; I agree to some extent; I agree; I don't know
Assess the consortium's interactions with societal stakeholders (those you were involved in) using the following statements. The interactions were fair.
Vastausvaihtoehto
I disagree; I disagree to some extent; I neither agree nor disagree; I agree to some extent; I agree; I don't know
Assess the consortium's interactions with societal stakeholders (those you were involved in) using the following statements. The interactions were successful overall.
Vastausvaihtoehto
I disagree; I disagree to some extent; I neither agree nor disagree; I agree to some extent; I agree; I don't know
Assess the consortium's interactions with societal stakeholders (those you were involved in) using the following statements. The interactions with the stakeholders will continue.
Vastausvaihtoehto
I disagree; I disagree to some extent; I neither agree nor disagree; I agree to some extent; I agree; I don't know
